The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2412 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
I will come in, and I might bring in Graham Robertson to provide more detail.
One of the concerns that I raised in response to your first question was how the proposed notification requirements would integrate into existing arrangements. If there was to be, for example, a new information technology system for the notification scheme, as I said, that would be for the Home Office to introduce—it is not in the Scottish Government’s power to do that. That would be quite complex; it would not just be a simple process. As I said, it is not clear exactly how the measure would sit within current processes.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
I will bring in Graham Robertson, who might be able to tell you that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
Okay. So you would be wanting a new register and a new IT system specifically for domestic abuse, as in—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
The significant costs have been estimated to be £4,747,000 for part 2 of the bill and £4,800,000 for part 4. Those are likely to be underestimates at this stage, given what we have spoken to stakeholders about. Jeff Gibbons has had those conversations and may be able to give more insight into that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
I do not have that detail with me—I do not know whether any of my officials do.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
From the evidence that I have heard, I do not believe that it can. As you know, we have MARACs, which are multi-agency risk assessment conferences, which focus on the safeguarding of high-risk victims by creating safety plans. We also have MATAC, which is multi-agency tasking and co-ordination, which focuses on identifying and managing serial perpetrators to prevent them from reoffending. We have DSDAS, which is the disclosure scheme that we touched on earlier, and we also have domestic abuse protection orders.
What is not clear to us as a Government is how what is proposed would fit in with the current processes and work in practice. That is our concern.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
Of course. In October, officials met justice partners and key stakeholders to recognise that DSDAS has been in operation for 10 years, to reflect on how it has operated and to gain feedback from support organisations with regard to how we can build on its success. The key outcomes of the discussions at the meeting in October included agreement that the group would meet again in the new year to look specifically at how to widen awareness of the scheme, particularly among seldom-heard groups and in relation to the power-to-tell aspects of the scheme. Other considerations include further discussions on the role of the third sector organisations that support the disclosure process. Meetings are going on to see how improvements can be made.
Jeff Gibbons might have more to say on that, as he is involved in those meetings.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
I have stats for domestic abuse, but I do not have that specific information, unless my officials do. I am happy to write to the committee on that specific point.
The issue of data collection has been raised in the evidence sessions—I am acutely aware of it, and there needs to be improvement there. Data improvement has been a clear focus of the domestic abuse justice partners round table, and work to date has included reviewing and mapping domestic abuse-related data held by justice partners, with particular reference to data on protected characteristics.
The group is currently progressing a working paper that will draw together the findings of the data-mapping exercise, including identifying data gaps and what opportunities there might be for data improvement.
I agree that we need to improve data, but there is work on-going. Graham Robertson might have more stats for you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
Graham Robertson might want to come in on that in relation to the protection side. It is quite a specific question. Each piece of legislation would differ in terms of what was being implemented, so the cost of the training involved would be very variable.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
There are some things that can be done with regard to sex offences, which is a different subject. However, in relation to your bill, I think that there are processes in place. I know that the member is passionate about this area. It is unfortunate that we are not in a position to see how the bill’s provisions could fit in with the system that is already in place for domestic abuse.