The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1344 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Paul McLennan
That is a very good point, which almost feeds into the discussion on training and how to monitor it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Paul McLennan
I have a working example that builds on Willie Rennie’s point. On Monday, I held an energy conference in East Lothian that included Edinburgh College and companies that are investing all over East Lothian, including Scottish Power, SSE and Fred Olsen; we also had the Energy Skills Partnership. One key thing that we have been trying to do for years now is to make forecasts—indeed, Willie Rennie made a point about knowing where the demand for jobs will be—and some frustration was expressed at the conference at the forecasting of future demand.
How much do you work with bodies such as the Energy Skills Partnership to look at the demand across various parts of Scotland? Edinburgh College, which had representatives at the conference, would be relevant to that activity. What interactions are you having with the likes of the Energy Skills Partnership to identify skills and opportunities and to know what will be required almost a year in advance? Those jobs will become available, but it is important that the skills are prepared a year or two in advance. That was a real working example that we saw when we discussed these matters on Monday.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Another key partner, as well as the colleges, is the local authority, through, for example, its East Lothian works programme. Does your work feed into that of local authorities? What part do they play, and how do you feed into it? There are fantastic training opportunities for kids in East Lothian, and it is important to maximise them. I am thinking, for example, of the £100 million investment that was made in a company called Had Fab and the 40 or 50 new apprenticeships that came out of that. It has been a game changer for lots of people. Where do local authorities come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
On your point about age and maturity, every child will be different when it comes to how mature they are for their age, but is there some cut-off point—say, when a child is over 12, over 15 or whatever? I know that that is a bit of a “How long is a piece of string?” question, but do you have any thoughts on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
It is good to hear your comments.
Leah Rivka, is there anything that you want to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I do not know whether you heard our earlier discussion about age and maturity. As we all know, kids can mature at different ages. You hinted at it when you talked about secondary school. Will you expand on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Good morning. You probably heard the questions that I put to the previous panel. I would like to hear your views on the process that the bill proposes for withdrawal from RO and RME. There are three aspects of that process, the first of which is the requirement for schools to inform a child if their parent asks for them to be withdrawn from RO or RME. Secondly, when a request has been made, the child will be given an opportunity to express their views, and the school must seek to have a discussion with the child and the parent if the child objects to being withdrawn. Thirdly, the school must respect the child’s wishes if their view differs from that of their parent. Previous witnesses raised the issue of the age and maturity of the pupil, which they thought was important, although their views differed.
I am particularly interested in hearing a legal perspective. Who would like to go first?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Thank you for that. Angela O’Hagan was nodding away there. Angela, do you want to add anything else on the UNCRC point and the general question?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Rachel Fox, do you have anything to add on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
That really strengthens the point that was made earlier on; you put across a very good point. I do not know whether anybody wants to add to that.