The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1242 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Paul McLennan
I refer members to my entry in the register of interests. I am still a serving councillor in East Lothian Council.
In what ways does the minister think the current charter has helped to improve standards and outcomes for tenants and other service users?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Paul McLennan
This does not relate to the charter, but is there anything that we can keep an eye on? If there was a deterioration, are there other indicators outwith the charter? For example, are there regular reviews, so that we can keep an eye on the views of individual tenants? I know that that is slightly outwith the charter, but it would be worth monitoring.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Paul McLennan
Minister, you talked about connectivity in relation to the housing to 2040 strategy, the third national land use strategy and so on, all of which are important, although they have different timescales attached. The key thing for me is, how do we monitor that connectivity during the period of NPF4? We need to ensure that the connectivity that exists at the outset remains in place as NPF4 evolves. Obviously, the “Housing to 2040” strategy is vitally important.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Paul McLennan
That will be welcome. Heads of Planning Scotland specifically referred to the point. I look forward to seeing that guidance.
My final question is about connections not so much to policies but to other measures. The key ones are the minimum all-tenure housing land requirement figures and the housing needs and demand assessment. At a previous meeting, Homes for Scotland mentioned those figures, which set a context for the rest of NPF4 and specifically how we deliver the “Housing to 2040” strategy. Will you talk a little bit more about that? Homes for Scotland was keen to explore the issue with you. I do not know what discussions are already going on. Will you also say a bit about how progress will be monitored over the period of NPF4 and how we will deliver the figures in the strategy?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Paul McLennan
The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors spoke to us about how the infrastructure-first approach might be delivered. Could you expand on that? Also, the 2019 act mentioned the possibility of an infrastructure levy. Could you say a little about that, too?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Paul McLennan
I will ask another question before we bring in Fiona Simpson. What lessons on deliverability can we learn from previous frameworks that we can take into NPF4 to ensure that we maximise deliverability? It is important that we have the housing targets but it is vital that we learn lessons on deliverability from previous frameworks. What will we take forward from them?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Paul McLennan
I refer everyone to my entry in the register of members’ interests: I am a serving councillor on East Lothian Council.
I have a couple of questions, one of which is about development in the countryside. We heard some evidence that current planning legislation possibly acts as a barrier to innovative development in the countryside, which is necessary for rural diversification and maintaining rural communities. I have spoken to Scottish Agritourism on the matter, too. It is keen to double the value of the sector to £1 billion. What are your comments on how NPF4 can facilitate such development?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Paul McLennan
That leads nicely on to my next two questions, the first of which was just touched on. Do local authority planning departments have sufficient suitably qualified staff and funding to deliver the desired NPF4 outcomes? I think that I know what the answer will be, and I can see the wry smiles from witnesses already, so there will probably be a few who want to respond. Also, how can we best attract people into the profession in the coming years?
I will go to Jane Tennant first, then to Steven Heddle, and then open it up to the others. Jane will be first, as she has been in the industry only in recent times.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Paul McLennan
I refer members to my entry in the register of members’ interests. I am a serving councillor on East Lothian Council.
I will expand on the convener’s points in the first couple of questions. My question is about the different sections of the national spatial strategy in the draft NPF4. In comments that we have had so far, there has been concern that those do not carry through to national planning policies and that there seems to be a disconnect. Do you share that concern? If so, do you have any examples? What would be the best way to try to make sure that there is connectivity? I will go to Pam Ewen first on that and then to Sarah Shaw.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Paul McLennan
Do the national planning policies need to be reviewed more broadly? Are they reviewed piece by piece—policy by policy? I know that we had the planning review just a couple of years ago but, as you said, connectivity is important because of what we are moving forward to. I ask Pam Ewen and the rest of the panel whether we need a much broader review or whether connectivity across the policy sphere can be ensured through policy-by-policy review.