The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1834 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
When is it ever less than expected?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
We have these tinkering discussions between the autumn and spring budget revisions every year because that is a function of having yearly budgets, and I am always struck by the fact that a lot of what we discuss is just for information and we do not get anywhere near looking at the aggregate picture or the real issues. I am thinking about that because of the convener’s opening discussion about reassigning money to the delivery point. My working assumption is that the Scottish Government does that so that it can retain control, because the only way to retain control of a fixed budget is to have reassignment. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have a gentle challenge. Although there may be a shift in the future, there is still ring-fenced funding for local government so that the Government can ensure that its priorities are met. I may have asked this question last year, but why do you not attribute the same discipline to yourselves in respect of, say, the housing budget—I use that example because of the multi-factor economic benefits, although it may be a bad example because of the issue of capital, which we may get to—by fixing that as n per cent of the overall budget?
The problem with “tinkering”, as I describe it, is that it always involves short-termism. If you do not set aside a certain percentage and say that it will always be spent on something that we know gives economic benefits, you are perpetuating the status quo of tinkering. Notwithstanding that, I fully accept that annual budgets are a function of a fixed budget and the role of the Treasury. However, every year I hear about the constant tinkering of moving budget moneys from pot to pot, which has an insidious impact on long-term strategic planning that is aligned with economic growth.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
That risk is not a surprise to me, and I suspect that it is not a surprise to you, either. I am therefore surprised that we are in this position. An assessment of risk—not just a treatment of what funds come back—must surely have been part and parcel of the decision on which budget pot those contributions went into. Is that a matter of catching up with what is still a relatively immature system of Whitehall fiscal transfers? Is there something more?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
Ms Johnson, I do not know whether you have any final comments.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
You probably heard me express concern about timescales to the earlier panel. I do not know the exact date, but it is proposed that the stage 1 debate on the bill be held in the chamber in December. When we come back in the new year, we will have 12 working weeks—not 11 as I said earlier—in which to deal with a multitude of other legislation. After the stage 1 debate, the bill will come back to the committee for stage 2, before returning to the chamber for stage 3.
First, based on your knowledge and experience to date, how realistic is it that the required work can be completed within that timescale?
Secondly, what must be put in place for that to happen? What would be your top ask to get the bill into the condition that we might like it to be in? I fully accept your comments about the levy not being fair, which is what we have heard from contributors across the board.
Anna Gardiner looked at me first, so you can go first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
I know that my colleagues are keen to ask questions, but before Seth Finegan comes back in, I want to introduce one last thread, which is about data. I was recently in Lithuania, where they have created what they call a data lake, which is an aggregated data set of all their public sector data. Of course, that will be immensely powerful when they start to look at preventative spend. Before I stop, I would like your reflections on that. Where are we with data, and do you have a sense of understanding how important it is? Seth, please come in first and finish off on the previous point.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have a final question. What is your attitude and risk appetite for generative AI, or rather the black box nature of it? We have been talking about pretty early-doors usage of AI, but we all know that there will be challenges with generative AI and the basis of statistical probability versus genuine cognition. In your businesses, is the attitude you are taking, “We will deal with that when we start to smell it, but we are not at that point yet”, or is it something that you are already actively considering?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
I invite final comments from Peter Proud and Sarah Ronald on data.