The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2078 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
I apologise if this came up while I was offline, but I know that you made a comment about the critical dependency between Scotland and the rest of the UK and how, frankly, the UK cannot get to net zero without Scotland’s contribution, particularly around land and peat.
Will you give some more flavour of that? If you have already done that, just let me know, and we can move on.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
This is my question, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
I will carry on.
It is important that we disaggregate revenue and capital. David Melhuish, you commented in the Scottish Property Federation submission’s that the SPF has a “particular concern” about the “reduction in Capital Investment”. ICAS probably has a view on that issue as well. In the light of an anticipated 20 per cent reduction to the Scottish Government’s capital budget over the next five years—which we know is significant if we understand what capital can do for an economy—do you have anything to add on that? That reduction represents real challenges for the Scottish Government.
I also picked up a wee throwaway comment in the SPF submission about a 54 per cent decline in construction activity from July 2023 to July 2024, which seems utterly staggering.
Perhaps you could go first, David, and then Alice Telfer might want to come in on this point on behalf of ICAS.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
Given the additional complexity that Alison Hosie introduced, my question about whether you generally see an appetite for this work is even more moot.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
That sounds like much more of a pivot to a focus on outcomes, rather than the simple adopting of the measures that we have been talking about.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
You touch on a culture of delivery. I am also interested in commentary on that from anybody else.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
To add to that, we have not yet touched on the even bigger picture of aligning to the SDGs. Sarah Davidson, you want to come in. I know that you will want to answer my first question, but perhaps you will reflect on that as well.
11:45Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
Replaced?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
I have a final, quick-fire question to make sure that we have bottomed out a thread that a few people have asked about. It is fine to give a one-word answer. Do you genuinely see the Government having a demonstrable appetite for this work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. What a great discussion so far. I am enjoying your contributions. I will pick up on a few points. Michael Marra came up with the interesting phrase “ideological adherence”—which, I am sure, we could debate—but that begs the question of accountability versus responsibility in a devolved setting. I fully accept what you said about Wales, but we all recognise that we are fairly early in our journey and that that is also the case with Northern Ireland. In this strange set-up, what challenges do you see from the difference between accountability and responsibility?
Max French, you are nodding, so you have to go first.