Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 19 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2496 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

You have given a very clear and comprehensive explanation, so thank you very much.

To bring in Professor Yüksel Ripley and Dr MacPherson, I want to get a sense of whether the bill’s framing as it is currently documented is in the right place.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

I am always open minded enough to hear more about AI.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

Thank you.

Mr Tariq, the faculty’s commentary is that the bill’s good-faith provision is expressed in the negative and you would rather see it expressed in the positive, but I want to flesh that out a bit more.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

That is very useful. Thank you very much.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

That is good.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

Peter Ferry, I have not given you a chance to come in. Do you have any final reflections before I hand back to the convener?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

To ask the Scottish Government what it considers to be an acceptable risk of harm as defined in the Scottish Prison Service policy on the admission of transgender women to women’s prisons. (S6O-05239)

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

I put on the record that the policy is about placing biological men in women’s prisons. Risk has two components: first, the chance of harm, and secondly, the nature of that harm. Most violence against women goes unreported. A male prisoner may have been convicted for certain offences, but any other history is not known. Does that constitute an acceptable risk? Many women in prisons suffer from trauma caused by male violence. Does fear and anxiety, halted recovery or retraumatisation constitute an acceptable risk? Does the removal of a female prisoner’s right to safety, privacy and dignity constitute an acceptable risk?

Unless the Government is happy to tolerate harm to women, it must inform the Scottish Prison Service to remove the notion of acceptable risk of harm from its policy. Even better, it should surely be told to obey the law as confirmed by the Supreme Court.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

McCloud Remedy

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

The reason I am asking about this goes back to the comments made earlier by the convener. While I was listening to that exchange, I, too, was struggling to understand from point A to point B where you anticipate you will be N per cent completed on whatever scheme or whatever circumstances and, therefore, the interim staging points. Are you stepping through at that level of detail with Mr McKee? Listening to that exchange, I did not really have any increased confidence of the probability of you meeting those deadlines without understanding the probability of the interim deadlines, if I am making myself clear. Are you able to step through that with Mr McKee, or is he so busy—I imagine he is extraordinarily busy—just taking the endpoint without interrogating the interim points?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

McCloud Remedy

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Michelle Thomson

Given that the people who are most interested in watching this session or, indeed, in attending it are the ones who have not yet derived satisfaction, I gently suggest that they are probably less confident about the issues that we have pulled out—particularly the perennially moving date for when things will be completed.

You touched on it a little bit earlier, but I would like to hear you walk through what you will do. Knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?

11:15