The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2256 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I note what Donald Cameron is saying about the swift removal of the services. However, does he agree that the hardware left for deployment by the Taliban—by the US military, it is suggested—including 22,000 Humvees, 64,000 machine guns, 350,000 assault rifles, 33 Blackhawk helicopters, 176 artillery pieces and 126,000 pistols, can only be considered a cause for concern for global security?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I note that London is soon to host the world’s biggest arms fair. Surely, given the member’s comments and points, which many of us agree on, what we actually need to be hosting is the world’s biggest humanitarian fair.
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
On a point of order, Presiding Officer, my app did not resurrect itself and I was unable to register my vote. I would have voted yes.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I realise that it is a slightly different question for Dave Moxham.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
That is what I was alluding to earlier in respect of endemic structural issues in our financial system.
I am keen to ensure that, before we finish, everyone has the chance to put on the record their findings about debt. However, I am aware of the time, so you should be brief before the convener calls me to order.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I will carry on with that in a moment, but I understand that Dave Moxham wants to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I am sorry to interrupt you, Charandeep, but I am asking whether you disaggregate all data in all of your surveys.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I want to pick up on that before I go to Charandeep Singh. I am aware of the time. Given your experience and background, and in light of what you have said about the nature of women’s businesses, to what extent does the structural management of debt exclude gender considerations in how banking is currently run?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, everybody. It is nice to be able to reacquaint myself with some people whom I knew previously.
I was very struck by Carolyn Currie’s comment about the disaggregation of data and how important that is. However, before I move on to ask Carolyn some questions about that, I want to ask the other representatives whether they disaggregate all the sample data by women-led businesses? That question is for everyone, bar Carolyn.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Okay—I will carry on for now then.
The responses were illuminating. In relation to the disaggregation of data, I was extraordinarily struck by the data set that Carolyn Currie provided, and by her point about people who become entrepreneurs out of necessity versus opportunistic entrepreneurs, as we might say. The former have different needs because of how they have arrived at running their own businesses.
I am particularly interested in following up on Carolyn Currie’s comment about structural issues. She has said:
“structural inequalities prevail”.
Perhaps we have a slight example of that in the point that we are routinely not gathering disaggregated data, but I am interested in hearing and understanding more about what specifically she meant by that.