Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2256 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Economic Recovery

Meeting date: 22 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

Good morning. I want to address some questions to Charles Hammond. You commented earlier that Scotland is “peripheral” to Europe. With regard to comparative shipping figures—I do not know how up to date these figures are now—there were reports that Reykjavik in Iceland, which has a population of about 350,000, shipped as much as Grangemouth. What are the current comparable figures, and what might be the reason for that?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Economic Recovery

Meeting date: 22 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

With regard to the performance of all the ports that you own, where does Grangemouth fit relative to the others? What ranking would you give it?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Economic Recovery

Meeting date: 22 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

Where stuff is shipped out of some of your other ports down south, do you have a sense of the percentage of leakage?

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 22 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

To ask the Scottish Government what support it is giving to young people in the run-up to the 26th United Nations climate change conference of the parties—COP26—to ensure that their views on climate change are listened to. (S6O-00176)

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Decision Time

Meeting date: 22 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My connection dropped and I was unable to vote. I would have voted no.

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 22 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

We all know that our young people will live the longest with the decisions that we make today. Given that and the fact that the climate youth conference that the cabinet secretary mentioned will be the platform in which young people can be heard on the issues, can the cabinet secretary outline how ideas and suggestions that are proposed at said conference will be introduced to COP26? Based on the conference, how will Scottish outcomes be measured?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Performance Framework

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

The just transition commission made a statement about moving beyond gross domestic product as a measure of Scotland’s progress. We have all wrestled with GDP being a crude but internationally recognised measure. How might you be able to move beyond it and how might that play into the work of other agencies, such as the Scottish Fiscal Commission? At a previous meeting, I asked witnesses from the SFC how they reflected the risks of climate change in doing their forecasts. I appreciate that the matter is complex, but I would also appreciate your latest thinking on that complexity, particularly in regard to GDP and other measures.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Performance Framework

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

Given the undoubted complexities that have been introduced by Covid and Brexit, and the challenging themes around net zero, just transition, human rights, equalities and wellbeing, what plans—if any—are you able to outline today with regard to your thinking about how you might develop the NPF?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Performance Framework

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

Like you, Mr Swinney, we are all aware of the NPF’s history and development; I accord it value in and of itself, while understanding how it started. However, when I went through the NPF, I found that it was incredibly difficult to derive any meaning from an assessment of whether performance was maintaining or worsening.

In reading anything, I look first for an outline of the methodology. You might not want to give a multitude of data sets away, but I had no sense of how you arrived at the conclusions. From an academic perspective, if I read anything with no sense of the methodology that is used, I am inclined to ask, “How do I know that this is true?” That follows on from Daniel Johnson’s point. Would you, in considering the NPF’s development, be prepared to set out some indication of the methodology as an aid?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Performance Framework

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Michelle Thomson

To evaluate where we are, there has been a lot of debate since the starting point, which you recall, on determining the value that is added by public spend and, therefore, arriving at the national performance framework. I appreciate the complexity, but do you see a further drift towards making the link between public spend and outcomes, or do you largely conclude that that is incredibly complex—a view with which I have a lot of sympathy—and that we will carry on as we are with a broad framework? That relates to a point that Daniel Thomson made.