The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1690 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Post-Covid, there is an opportunity for everyone to think differently.
Does any of the other witnesses have any final reflections on any of the themes that I have touched on?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
My first question is quite technical and follows on from our discussion about recognising the whole fiscal landscape. I am genuinely interested in the service concession approach. The joint submission states:
“This is not merely an accounting exercise—it has genuine implications for funding Local Government services into the future”.
It goes on to highlight opportunities in that regard, such as the ability to “invest in assets” and “deliver on net zero”. If those are the opportunities, what are the risks of the approach?
Secondly, are your concerns about the Scottish Government’s review to do with the fact that there is a review, or are you concerned about the timescale, because you would like to see a clear outcome sooner rather than later? I suspect that my question is for Alan Russell initially, but Gail Macgregor might want to come in, too.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Can I just follow up on that? It almost sounds as if our failure to recognise such businesses is embedding systemic issues in our economy. Through my questioning, it has become abundantly clear to me—I might previously have said that it was clear, but I am now quite shocked by it—how systemic the issues are, no matter how unintended they arguably always are. It has also become clear how important it is to understand the issues if we are to understand the role of women in business and enterprise creation.
I will move on. I posited a question to the earlier panel on the back of what all of today’s witnesses were asked to submit to the committee, and I will ask it of all three of you. If you were to revisit your submission and say how the Scottish Government budget should address the impact of the pandemic on women-led businesses—if the question were narrowed down to that—how would you answer?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I will keep asking the question. Just to finish off on that theme, I will give a simple example. I have been enjoying reading the document by Benny Higgins titled “Financing Scotland’s Recovery”. Just as a follow-up, I thought that I would do a wee search in it on references to women and gender, but there is not one mention of those in what I regard as a very good document. That omission is utterly systemic in terms of lending and access to finance and it is an even greater issue than the figures that Susan Murray quoted for venture capital.
I will move on to a related issue. In our conversation, we have touched on focusing on outcomes, and a number of good points have been made about how the fiscal framework perhaps affects outcomes because we need to run a balanced budget rather than focus on a consequentialist ethical approach, if you like. Susan, you commented in your written submission on aligning the national performance framework with the United Nations sustainable development goals. I know that some work is being done on that. It is perhaps about having, as we have discussed, a human rights and diversity focus. Would that alignment go some way to starting to give us more outcome focus in what we are trying to do? Perhaps my question is: how do we get that outcome focus by using the UN SDGs and so on?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Mindful of the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s reputation for being the most exciting committee, I am going to take it up a level. This is a question for all three witnesses. One of the questions that everyone has been asked to submit on is how the Scottish Government budget should address the different impacts of the pandemic across a number of categories, including age and income. I wonder whether you might answer that question again, but with regard to the impact on women, given the concerns that have been highlighted about key workers and so on. I suspect that Linda Somerville will want to come in first here, but I am certainly interested in hearing other people’s thoughts on how the Scottish budget can address concerns with regard to women.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Obviously, that raises the question of what you would cut to support such pay increases.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Gail, do you want to close this out? How should the Scottish Government address issues specifically relating to women?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Did you want to come in, Alan?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I am sorry to interrupt. You have given a clear description of what the issue is about. You used the term “anomaly”. To draw you back to my question, I understand what you are talking about, but what I am trying to draw out is whether there are any risks to the Scottish Government of enabling the service concession approach. You have been clear that there will be no additional costs. I am trying to explore whether you have identified any additional risks.