The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1690 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Simon, do you have any final comments on the range of questions that I have asked?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I want to pick up on another point. I asked some questions earlier about the potential for conflict of interest. What is your experience of being asked to disclose any potential conflict of interest? Often, as we know, that does not necessarily mean that there is such a conflict. However, where there might be, or where there is even the illusion that there could be, or any hint at all, people will often disclose that information, because propriety is so important.
Are you aware of any processes in inquiries that you have dealt with in which the option for disclosure was given?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
You said that that instance was dealt with as soon as it came to light, but my point is about whether you would ordinarily expect some kind of declaration of interest up front. There are many fora in which people would declare something up front, rather than when it came to light, which is potentially after the horse has bolted.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Perhaps I should bring in Michael Clancy. The example that I gave earlier involved a solicitor acting on behalf of core participants in an inquiry who had been calling vigorously, via the media, for a public inquiry and was also best friends with the justice secretary who granted the inquiry. In that example, what kind of action would you anticipate from the solicitor, under Law Society regulations, to set out at least a potential, if not an actual, conflict of interest?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I just want to finish off on couple of things. I think that it was you, Lord Hardie, who said that it would be up to the chair to go back to the Scottish Government if they were to seek an augmentation of the terms of reference. In one of the inquiries that is currently under way, there has been an intensive media campaign by one of the lawyers, rather than the chair, to press the Scottish Government for an augmentation of the terms of reference. Is that unusual, in your experience?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay—I am not certain about that.
I will also finish off the discussion about Maxwellisation. I disclose an interest, as I once ran a small business in primary research with Roger Mullin, who gave evidence about Maxwellisation. I read his submission with interest. One thing that is implicit rather than explicit relates to a power balance in going through the process of giving people the right to respond. I suspect that, inevitably, the people who have that right will have deeper pockets, and they may be representative companies. Has that power balance ever been considered in relation to Maxwellisation?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. It was worth confirming that, because that is a useful detail. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
As MSPs, we are all given guidance on these matters when we join the Parliament. Where we think that there could be a perception of conflict, we are duty bound to disclose it, even if it is subsequently deemed not to be a conflict. If we are expected to do that, it would seem not unreasonable for highly paid lawyers to do likewise.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I was just asking a general question. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
We have had quite a lot of media interest that perhaps suggests that the problem is uniquely Scottish, but you are making it quite clear that it actually appears to be UK-wide.