The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2256 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Entrepreneurship and innovation are central to driving economic growth. One might suggest that they are the twins of purposeful change in the economy, driving a culture of development and productivity improvement. All innovation involves what the late Professor Tom Burns called the “application of novelty” and he said:
“All novelty involves some degree of risk.”.
Innovation and entrepreneurship are social phenomena that exist at their best in cultures that support change and risk taking; they do not thrive in risk-averse cultures. I would contrast that with our activity as parliamentarians and Government ministers. In the main, there is too much of a tendency to see each and every failure in policy making as bad and a matter to be condemned. That encourages risk aversion among policy makers. If the initiatives that we take to support innovation and entrepreneurship were never to lead to some failures, that in itself would be a major failure.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am always in favour of oversight and accountability, but I am making a separate point. One can have accountability and a clear line of sight on funding, but, specifically on the matter of entrepreneurship and innovation, we must accept that we need to increase our threshold for risk. That will include public sector funding. We also want to crowd in more private finance, because the private sector has more of a view about this.
That leads me to the end of my remarks, but I have enjoyed the debate, nevertheless.
16:13Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is very kind—I really appreciate it. Lorna Slater mentioned this morning’s meeting of the Economy and Fair Work Committee, and I was going to point out that the witnesses were really talking about the large-scale lenders making the shift. It is really important for us to bear that in mind in relation to what we are able to influence in this Parliament, as I think that the reference to that kind of large-scale corporate lending was drawn from the United States. My intervention was just to make a clarification.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Will the member give way?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
I thank the member—I will try to be quick. I must make the point that, yes, tax is a consideration, but, if we are talking about creating an entrepreneurial culture, we have to factor in the economic system as well. Surely the fact that so many key powers—over monetary policy, control of interest rates, money supply, corporation tax, employment law, migration, energy strategy, pensions, export support and so on—lie with Westminster should be factored in to it as well?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you very much for taking the intervention.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am interested in the culture. Mary Morgan, it was interesting that you said that, until you were preparing for this evidence session, you had not realised that there could be other, different types of inquiries. You thought that they were all judge led and statutory.
Rebecca McKee, from your perspective, how did we get here? It is as if everybody is a winner when people and politicians demand an inquiry—lawyers are happy because they make a lot of money, and the Government is happy because it has made the issue go away. However, it is a long time until we know whether the people who were greatly affected by the issue at hand are happy—that could be years down the line. Culturally, how on earth did we get to the point that we are at today, based on your work and the research you have been doing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. My next question is for Rebecca McKee. Picking up on a point that my colleague John Mason focused on, I note that we have all said that we must be mindful of the cost. Where, if anywhere, is real pressure coming from to move it beyond being mindful of the cost? Is there any pressure? The House of Lords committee is looking at it, but I am thinking about what happens internally within Government.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Do you agree that no other public sector project would incur expenditure of, potentially, £30 million with no governance whatsoever and no stage gating around costs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.