Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 27 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1690 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Consumer Scotland

Meeting date: 24 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

Thank you for that, both of you.

Susan, I will stay with you for the time being. Given that, often, women are the most vulnerable of a variety of groups—we talked about vulnerable consumers—which specific women’s organisations have you consulted to get those unique insights? What specific policies have you developed to make sure that you target 51 per cent of the population effectively? Could you talk me through those questions?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

I ask John Connolly and Antony Clark whether they agree with that point about positive action to involve the public fully.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Convener

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

I nominate John Mason.

John Mason was chosen as convener.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

It is alphabetical order, and T comes last.

I thank the witnesses for joining us. I have a few questions. I first want to come to Alison Payne. We have had an interesting discussion, but we have not touched on public perceptions all that much. Arguably, the public are behind the curve, and react to changes by thinking, “It’s going to cost me more,” or, “I am going to get less.” In your opinion, in light of the step back by the former Deputy First Minister from the resource spending review—we now know that the local bodies will look at their own efficiencies or reforms—and accepting all your earlier comments, where do the public fit in that? To what extent is the new approach a missed opportunity for making the public part of this “burning platform for change” that Antony Clark talked about?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

Professor Connolly, I hope that you will be able to add, from an academic perspective, your recommendations on the most effective ways in which the Scottish Government could involve the public.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

Yes. I suppose that my point is whether, given the data that we have on the strict definition of public services, that is actually an underestimate of the implications, and, therefore, when we look at public sector reform, whether the implications are greatly more significant. I am just trying to get a handle on that.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

My last question is slightly more about the nuts and bolts. By getting individual bodies to look at their own efficiencies or reforms—however we want to phrase it—we are missing the opportunity to create shared services, which is not an unusual way to get economies of scale. I am thinking about having multiple finance directors and human resources directors and, of course, procurement, where you can get economies of scale.

Probably for that reason alone, I was surprised by the step back from the RSR. It seems to me that, with the best will in the world, turkeys do not vote for Christmas. Do you agree that those areas are perhaps obvious ones where we might want to start to look at change, if it is not reform? I appreciate your analogy, Alison, and I accept that that is rather crude. I would regard that not as reform but perhaps as lower-hanging fruit. Since you are smiling, Alison, you may as well go first.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

Can I have comments on that from John Connolly and Antony Clark?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

It is about the framing, if you like.

I have a slightly technical question for Antony Clark to help furnish my knowledge. As I understand it, there are rules about what is deemed to be a public body and is therefore pulled into the figures, the increase in which I saw in your submission. It strikes me that there may well be other bodies that do not fulfil those criteria but that receive the majority of their money from the Scottish Government. There is an analogy with IR35 in the private sector—arguably, if the rules were applied, those bodies would be deemed part of the public sector. Are you aware of that scenario? I am not asking you to name anyone; it is an in-principle question.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 23 May 2023

Michelle Thomson

Do you have a comment, Professor Connolly?