The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1017 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Karen Adam
That is helpful. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Karen Adam
I think that you did a wonderful job—thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Karen Adam
I asked the first panel a specific question about the Scottish Government’s plans to introduce new human rights law based on four international human rights treaties. I mentioned you, Dr Tickell, as you have flagged up a concern that that might cause difficulties similar to those that we have seen with the UNCRC bill. I will ask you what I asked the previous witnesses: what warnings or advice can you give the Scottish Government, the Parliament and duty bearers as we move forward with the legislation?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Karen Adam
I leave that to you to decide.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Karen Adam
Good morning to the witnesses. As you are all probably aware, the Scottish Government has plans to introduce a Scottish human rights bill, which will incorporate four international human rights treaties into law. Dr Andrew Tickell, who will join us as part of the second panel today, has said that
“the difficulties facing this Bill”
apply
“just as powerfully”
to further incorporation. With that in mind, what do you think the Scottish Government, the Parliament, duty bearers and rights holders can learn from the UNCRC bill amendments, and how will that apply to our Scottish human rights bill? I am probably looking to Fiona Menzies and Jan Savage to answer that.
10:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Karen Adam
I will follow that up. Is there a solution—or several solutions? What can we look at in order to make this workable?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Karen Adam
I have nothing more on that, convener. It was really helpful.
I do have another question, though. Given that this is our only evidence-taking session on the UNCRC bill, I just want to ask you—I will ask the second panel this, too—whether you feel that that is enough for us as a committee to be doing. If not, is there anyone else from whom we should be hearing?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Karen Adam
I really appreciate that, convener. I have been sitting here, thinking about what questions to ask, but instead I feel the need to come in and answer quite a lot of the questions, given that I sat on the board for the audit.
I thank Evelyn Tweed for the shout out. I would like to make the point that it is possible to have cultural change, but we need to lead by example as a Parliament and enforcing some rules helps to shift cultural change in the direction that it needs to go in. When I was a potential candidate and was going through the selection process, I was asked several times how I would juggle my home life and my caring responsibilities. Given that it was an all-female shortlist, there were no men to be asked the same question, but I could see that, in other areas, men were never asked it.
I was also told by several people that my lived experience—my experience of being a single parent with a few children with additional support needs and of being an interpreter for my deaf father—endeared them to the idea of wanting to vote for me to be a candidate. They thought that it was fantastic life experience to bring to the role. At the same time, however, that was juxtaposed with their concern that it might hinder me, time-wise, in that role.
We have to look deeply and see the internal biases that there still are with regard to how we feel women can perform in roles. We should always bear that in mind—and not only with regard to women. Taking an intersectional approach is incredibly important. We should always have the issue at the forefront of our minds, and it is extremely important that we have—and keep active—those conversations within our parties.
Thank you for your time, convener.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Karen Adam
That is helpful. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Karen Adam
Good morning, minister. My question is in two parts. First—you have probably touched on this already—does the Scottish Government agree that there is a need for greater traceability and oversight of the selling of puppies in general?