The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1484 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
We are coming to the end of our session. Please correct me if you disagree, but I think that we are living in a society in which people seek to understand themselves a bit better. It is a positive thing for people to be self-reflective and to question why they behave or think in particular ways.
We have spoken a lot about the individual and adjustments for the individual. If we think about yesteryear, perhaps there was always the same number of neurodivergent people, but there was not as much self-reflection. Maybe behaviours were shamed in the past. Many people were in health institutions, many ended up in prison, and many ended up isolated and tagged as the eccentric in the village.
We now have a greater understanding of that, so as well as supporting the individual with adjustments, would it be better if we sought to take a whole-society approach that involved looking at how the world is created and set up for neurotypical individuals? Would it be better to take a bigger approach to ensure that society is set up for everyone and that adjustments do not have to be made all the time?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
I thank everybody so much for joining us today. This has been an incredibly helpful evidence session. The invitation is there: if things come to your mind after this meeting—things that you wish you had said or other contributions that you wish to make—the door is not closed, so please feel free to get in touch with the committee with anything else that you would like to add. For example, you had an example of a criminal justice system, Leo. It would be really helpful for the committee to get as full and rounded a picture as possible. Please do follow our inquiry over the next few weeks.
Thank you all once again. That concludes our business in public today, and I thank you all for your attendance. We will now move into private session to consider the remaining items on our agenda.
12:34
Meeting continued in private until 12:54.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
Welcome back to our second evidence-taking session, which will take place in a round-table format.
I welcome to the meeting Debbie Best, director, Differabled Scotland; Kabie Brook, chairperson, ARGH Scotland; Sofia Farzana, director and co-founder, Scottish Ethnic Minority Autistics; Marion McLaughlin, managing director and founder, Aurora Autistic Consulting; Rachel Parker, founding trustee, Autistic Voices Advocating Together for Autonomous Rights; Carolyn Scott, founder and researcher, ADHD Right Now; and Leo Starrs-Cunningham, treasurer, Autistic Mutual Aid Society Edinburgh. I hope that I got all of that right. You are all very welcome to join us this morning.
I will begin this morning’s conversation by inviting everyone to very briefly introduce themselves. I am the MSP for Banffshire and Buchan Coast, and convener of the committee.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
Thank you. We will now go to those who are joining us online.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
We now have questions from Marie McNair.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
Absolutely.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
We move to questions from committee members, beginning with Maggie Chapman.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
I do not think that anybody would disagree that getting a good night’s sleep, eating properly, consuming less processed food and avoiding doom scrolling on our phones would do us all good. As you say, those things disproportionately affect people who are neurodivergent, but engaging in those behaviours could be an indicator of neurodivergence—it might not be a question of one leading to the other, but they could be indicators. Someone who has had a baby with ADHD could talk to us all day about sleep.
We have talked about misdiagnosis, and heard that people might be misdiagnosed as autistic or with ADHD. Are there people who are not diagnosed with ADHD or autism but have been diagnosed with personality disorders, for example? Also, a disproportionate amount of women seem to be diagnosed with personality disorders. There seems to be a gap, in that more men are diagnosed with autism. Is that straight-up misogyny in healthcare?
10:15
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
That is great, and thank you all so much for joining us this morning.
We will now move on to the themes that we will be exploring this morning, and which committee members will take turns at introducing. Please indicate if you would like to come in on anything. If you are in the room, you can raise your hand or signal to me or the clerks—we will pick it up—and if you are online, please put an R in the chat. If you want to type out a question, that will be perfectly acceptable, too.
First off, I will go to Maggie Chapman, who has a question.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Karen Adam
I know that Rachel Parker would like to come in on this, but before I bring her in, would you be comfortable explaining what rejection sensitive dysphoria is?