The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1156 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Karen Adam
I am aware that we are well over time, but it is important that we have on record, very briefly, your views on monitoring and data gathering and the importance of it for everything that we have spoken about.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Karen Adam
Good morning, and welcome to the 10th meeting in 2025 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. Maggie Chapman and Evelyn Tweed will attend remotely.
The first item of business is consideration of motion S6M-17314, in the name of Tess White, on the removal of Maggie Chapman from office as a member of the committee. I refer members to paper 1 and I invite Tess White to speak to and move her motion.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. We move to questions from Maggie Chapman.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Karen Adam
Maggie Chapman, are you satisfied that you have said what you needed to say, or do you wish to take up Tess White’s invitation to speak?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Karen Adam
We are rapidly running out of time. We have had questions from only three members of the committee and we are still to hear from four members. I ask for the answers to be as succinct as possible, because I want all members to have their questions answered. However, please do not cut out essential information.
I am minded to extend our time a bit, but we have to be mindful that time is finite. Thank you for what has been a fantastic evidence session so far.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Karen Adam
Charlie McMillan can come in briefly.
12:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Karen Adam
We move to questions from Marie McNair.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. We move on to questions from Evelyn Tweed.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. We move to questions from Maggie Chapman.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you very much for that powerful opening statement.
Before we move on to questions, I advise members that, if we direct our questions to Jan Savage, she will direct us to the person that she wishes to respond.
I will start the questions. The report highlights a
“gulf between the rhetoric of taking a human rights-based approach and the reality of putting that into practice.”
It says that the coming home implementation plan fails to comply with the right to independent living. What is the consequence if the Scottish Government fails to comply with that right? Who is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the Scottish Government’s commitments to deinstitutionalisation are met?