The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1176 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
Before we move on to questions from Pam Gosal, I have a question of my own. Taking on board everything that you have said so far, how can we demonstrate that minimum core obligations can be met with regard to how equality impact assessments work in all spheres of government?
In my previous life as a local councillor, we always looked at equality impact assessments at the end of the process, after reports had been presented to us. Emma Congreve said that the structures are not set up for what we are trying to achieve in this respect. I can see that the structures do not include equality impact assessments in those areas that we should be concerned about, which should feed into the building of services in the first place. Often, such assessments are add-ons, but it costs additional money to add things on, and when there are cutbacks, they are the first things to go.
I want to look at how that can be changed and how equality impact assessments can be embedded into the structure of all spheres of government from the very beginning. How do you see that happening? Would that be possible, and would it help with a human rights budgeting approach? We are looking at accountability for local government in that regard. For example, I have seen some equality impact assessments on the closure of sheltered housing complexes. When a council goes ahead with such a closure even though it is evident that it will have detrimental impacts, where is the accountability? What rights do people have? My question is about where equality impact assessments should sit and to what extent they can be used to provide that accountability.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
That was really helpful—thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
That is interesting—thank you.
We move on to questions from Pam Gosal.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you both very much. Cabinet secretary, is the Scottish Government still committed to human rights budgeting, and, if so, what does that look like?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
Minister, you spoke about the equality and human rights budget advisory group. What progress has been made against the group’s recommendations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
Has the equality data improvement programme been improving outcomes? Where are we with that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
Maggie?
Apologies, but I did not hear what you said.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
I will kick off our questions and witnesses should indicate whether they want to come in and answer anything, as should members who have questions or want to ask supplementaries about anything that has been said.
What aspirations did you, as stakeholders, have for the Scottish Government’s progress towards taking a human rights budgeting approach over the course of this session of Parliament? Have those aspirations been met?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
Good morning and welcome to the 18th meeting of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee in 2025, session 6. We have apologies today from Rhoda Grant.
Our first agenda item is to agree to take agenda items 5 and 6 in private. Agenda item 5 is consideration of a work programme paper and item 6 will be consideration of the evidence that is taken by the committee during pre-budget scrutiny today. Do members agree to take those agenda items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you.
That brings us to the close of this evidence session. I thank everyone for their participation; it has been valuable for the committee in undertaking our scrutiny of human rights budgeting. We have a lot of information to take away. I thank the cabinet secretary and the minister for giving your time to enable us to do our accountability work on the issue. We will be in touch with the committee’s recommendations.
We now go into private to discuss the remaining items on our agenda.
12:09 Meeting continued in private until 12:53.