The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1311 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Marie McNair
I totally understand the point that the member is trying to make, but I believe that there are too many flaws in the bill and that, if agreed to, the legislation could be widened. Therefore, I cannot support the bill.
Dr Mary Neal, from the University of Strathclyde, has argued that the bill contained many areas that were subject to potential “slippage” and that, irrespective of how tightly the law was felt to have been drafted, there was ultimately no way of preventing people from challenging it.
Although the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee has remained neutral on the bill, it is exceptionally important for members to note that, on the point of a slippery slope, the committee stated:
“The Committee acknowledges that, should it become law, there may be a risk of the Bill being subject to human rights or other court challenges and that this could result in eligibility for assisted dying being extended over time.”
Others share that concern, and members will have seen those briefings. The fact that we are unable to guarantee that strict safeguards would be kept in place is a huge worry for me.
On a final point of concern, the definition of “terminal illness” in the bill is, in and of itself, rather broad. Many have noted that as a concern, including the Scottish Partnership for Palliative Care, which said:
“The definition of ‘terminal illness’ in the Bill is not precise enough ... and could mean that people with years to live are deemed eligible”.
That will have a real impact. There is concern, then, that there would be potential for the definition to include a wide range of long-term conditions.
Liam McArthur and other supporters have the best intentions with the bill, viewing it as a way to ease suffering, but the legislation would open a door that we might not be able to close. We cannot, with any great certainty, guarantee that safeguards would be kept in place. That leads us down a very dangerous path of living in a society that devalues the lives of the most vulnerable. Therefore, I cannot support the principles of the bill, and I will vote accordingly.
16:18Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Marie McNair
Sophie, as you are aware, some abusive partners have been known to drag out legal cases just to maintain control over their ex-partners. What more needs to be done and what safeguards are needed to ensure that ex-partners do not use the legal system to perpetuate abuse?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Marie McNair
I have a supplementary question on that point. Is the legal aid system open to abuse, and how rigorous is the financial assessment? I have heard some horror stories about abusive partners hiding assets in order to qualify for legal aid. Have you encountered that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you, I really appreciate your comments. Since no one else wants to add anything, I will hand back to the convener.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you for that.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Marie McNair
During the recent wear a hat day event in the Parliament, I met two of my constituents, Don and Rachel McKie, who, sadly, lost their son to a glioblastoma in 2006. Since that time, they have raised more than £50,000 for the Brain Tumour Charity. They are such an inspiring family.
Less survivable cancers such as brain tumours can be difficult to diagnose, as, often, they present as non-specific conditions. What more can be done to raise awareness? Are there any plans to commit further investment to fund the essential research that is required?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Marie McNair
To ask the Scottish Government how it is working to improve outcomes for people with brain tumours. (S6O-04616)
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Marie McNair
Minister, in your opening contribution, you set out what the Scottish Government is doing to eradicate child poverty. How is the Government responding to CESCR’s recommendations on food insecurity?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Marie McNair
Sure. What steps have been taken to embed intersectionality and equality into all anti-poverty and social security strategies.