The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1007 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Marie McNair
Good morning, ministers, and Councillor Heddle and officials. It is great to see you here this morning—we really appreciate your time.
I will touch on community councils. They have been around for many years—50 years, in fact. What role do you see them having in helping to deliver on the aspirations of the Verity house agreement?
I have two other questions. Should legislation be used to give community councils an enhanced role in local democracy? Are you confident that they are sufficiently representative of the local communities that they serve?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Marie McNair
Minister, the new deal states that the local government settlement will be simplified and consolidated. Will you expand on how you are progressing towards a settlement and on the benefits that that approach will deliver?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Marie McNair
Sarah Watters, would you like to make any further points?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Marie McNair
Good morning, panel. You have touched on my first question. If you have workers whose jobs require them to be physically present at a specific workplace, how do you support them to balance work and family life?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Marie McNair
Thanks. Those changes make the process much more accessible. Comparisons are made between processing times for PIP and ADP. Given that the decision-making processes are very different, do you think that those comparisons are of much value?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Marie McNair
The number of redeterminations is low. What more can be done to promote the claimant’s right to a redetermination?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Marie McNair
This is my last question. The number of appeals is also low, so what can be done to promote the right to appeal?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Marie McNair
Thank you for those helpful comments.
Andy, do you want to come in before I hand back to the convener?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Marie McNair
It is good to see you all at the committee. Understandably, the session has focused on processing times. I found your written submission very helpful. Social Security Scotland and the DWP have different approaches. Illustrating that point, in section 12 of your submission, you state that both the CDP and ADP
“improve significantly on the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) benefits which they replace.”
To give some context for what we are dealing with, can you expand on what you mean by that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2023
Marie McNair
That would be really helpful. Thanks for the answers. Obviously, encouragement can go only so far. The elephant in the room, which Andrea Bradley mentioned, is the fact that employment law is not devolved. Andrea, as you know, the STUC believes that employment law should be devolved. If it were to be devolved, what could the Scottish Government do to secure a fairer and more flexible employment landscape?