The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2904 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
Okay. Despite my knowledge of statistics, I am struggling at this point to get all those percentages, but I get the general point.
I know that you cannot go into the political side but, from the technical side, if, as you have all suggested, things are becoming more volatile—or, at least, we have more risk because Scotland now has more responsibility for a whole range of things—is there a technical argument that the £600 million or £700 million reserve should be increased? Can you answer that without going into the political space?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
If it comes down, that is good, but if it goes up, that is a problem. That leads me on to Professor Breedon’s comment that larger negative or positive reconciliations could become more likely. I read in paragraph 3.22 on page 25 of the fiscal update about the
“24 per cent chance of a negative reconciliation exceeding £600 million”.
Will you explain that to me a little bit? Is that just a random statistical thing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
But there might be something about front-line services.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
We have found it difficult to forecast social security exactly. Is that just because it is new? Will it calm down and be easier to forecast in future?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
We have covered quite a lot of ground already. We have talked about the potential £2.6 billion gap, but, perhaps more urgently, the forecast for 2027-28 is an £851 million negative reconciliation, which would be over our borrowing limit. Do you have any thoughts on how we will address that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
I certainly share your hope that the figure will reduce.
I discussed this issue with the Scottish Fiscal Commission in the previous evidence session. You have already said that you have asked for a review of the fiscal framework, and what we have been talking about emphasises the point that, as the Scottish budget has increased, the £700 million reserve and the £600-odd million borrowing limit have not increased proportionately, which concerns me quite a lot. It is all very well increasing them by inflation, but our responsibilities have increased by a lot more than inflation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
Thank you very much. I want to ask about capital expenditure. You mention in the strategy that you
“are currently exploring the use of revenue finance models”.
Can you expand on what that means?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
No, that is good. I shall leave it at that, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
The convener touched on quite a number of issues. I will go back to one or two of them, particularly the potential £851 million negative reconciliation in 2027-28.
I accept that the situation is uncertain. In the past, we have been warned about bad news but things have then improved. Does that mean that I can be relaxed about that figure? If not, what will the Government have to do? If the figure is £851 million, do we do nothing this year but, when we come to the 2027-28 budget, there will have to be a reduction?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
John Mason
We now have responsibility for social security, which is a more volatile thing.