The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3510 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning, and welcome to the 21st meeting in 2025 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee. The first item on our agenda is an evidence-taking session on the cost-effectiveness of Scottish public inquiries.
I welcome to the meeting John Sturrock KC and John Campbell KC. We have received apologies from Craig Hoy, who will be a few minutes late because of traffic.
I thank both witnesses for their short, sharp and helpful submissions to the committee’s call for views, and I will move straight to questions, kicking off with Mr Sturrock, methinks. In answer to the second question on the transparency of public inquiries in our call for views, you said that there is
“insufficient transparency and scrutiny in particular around control over timescales and costs.”
How can that be improved?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Oh—yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am absolutely sure that they would, but, as has been mentioned, an inquiry might be used in some circumstances to get a minister out of a tight spot politically, rather than necessarily being in the long-term public good. It would be helpful if ministers could say, in a diplomatic way, that they want to consider something but that the criteria for having a public inquiry have not been met, because otherwise we could have inquiries into myriad different things, and where would we be then? We want to reach a sensible and optimal position that also defends the value of public inquiries as more than something that is just grasped at when people are concerned that the services that they thought would deliver for them have not done so.
Would either of you like to make any further points before I wind up this session?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You do not get many public inquiry reports that are as short as that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Right. There is certainly a clamour for transparency in this age, because this is public money that we are talking about. I do not know whether you have seen the Official Report of last week’s meeting or whether you watched the meeting, but we uncovered one very stark issue. What causes the greatest concern is the opportunity costs, not the overall sum of money. For example, the police have talked about the huge impact on finances and staff resources. We can look at stress and all sorts of other issues if we wish, but those are the two main issues that the police have faced.
We might look at all of that and say that there should, perhaps, be a separate fund for public inquiries so that money is not taken out of the specific service that an inquiry relates to. However, if the inquiries that are going on under the current system progress, and if an inquiry that was expected to take one or two years takes five or 10—or even longer—there is surely a great need for transparency, given that the budgets seem to be open-ended. A number of individuals have pointed out that it is difficult to think of another area of public life, including in life-or-death areas such as the health service, where there are no budgetary or timescale parameters.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Indeed, but where is the justice in that? The child abuse inquiry has cost £96 million so far and has taken 11 years. Some of the people for whom the inquiry was directed at delivering justice will be long dead by the time that it reports. An inquiry might grow arms and legs and go on and on, but how does that deliver for the people for whom it is meant?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You have said that the Scottish Parliament should perhaps dedicate half a day a year to discussing inquiries.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I appreciate that, but, if someone has been involved in an inquiry for a number of years, I would have thought that they would have an emotional commitment to making sure that the recommendations that they had made were implemented. I would have thought that they would want to apply some pressure to ensure that that was the case.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Mr Sturrock, you have suggested that a parliamentary committee could be established to look at delivery. I suppose that an existing committee could do that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Mr Sturrock, you have said that there should be
“a clear ‘business plan’ / budget to cover planned activities / project scoping carried out at the outset”.
Given the number of inquiries that there are in Scotland and the United Kingdom, one would have thought that that would happen, but it does not seem to have had any impact on the duration of inquiries to date. How can that be tightened up to provide clarity for all concerned?