The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1053 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Craig Hoy
It is historical.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Craig Hoy
There is a Scottish Covid inquiry and a UK Covid inquiry, so there will be some degree of duplication. There are also asymmetrical approaches taken, for example, in relation to grooming gangs at this point in time. Louise Casey recommended to the UK Government that it should conduct an inquiry, the nature of which is still not absolutely certain, and you will be aware that there is now a lot of pressure on the Scottish Government to follow suit.
Do you believe that the victims of grooming gangs in Scotland deserve and require an inquiry? Would it be better for the England and Wales inquiry to extend its scope into Scotland? What are you currently doing to consult on what next steps the Scottish Government might take in respect of that crucial issue?
10:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Craig Hoy
On a point of detail, you will be aware that one of the reasons that the Government has given for why it cannot support Scottish Conservatives’ call for a public inquiry, when we asked for it recently in a proposed amendment to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, was that Professor Alexis Jay did not believe that it was necessary.
Are you aware of any subsequent correspondence between Professor Jay and the Scottish Government in respect of the interpretation of the advice that she gave?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Craig Hoy
I have one final question. To go back to a point that Michelle Thomson made about the issue of relationships with and between interested parties, it is often said that Scotland is a village in many respects, and it is therefore difficult to bring together a group in which people may not have prior relationships with others.
For example, I was at the Herald awards on Thursday night, as were you, and one of the lawyers referred to today was glad-handing with the First Minister and other politicians. There is a cosy situation in Scotland between decision makers, including the legal establishment.
What consideration should perhaps be given to looking outwith Scotland when we seek to bring in those who might chair or be involved with public inquiries at a senior level, for the avoidance of any doubt that there might be interested parties and interrelationships that could compromise the inquiry itself?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Craig Hoy
One element that apparently—according to some of the evidence that we have taken—gives the public confidence in an inquiry when it is set up is the fact that it is judge led. What is your view on that? Do you think that alternative approaches should perhaps be taken to certain inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Craig Hoy
One of the inquiries that, by common consent, might have benefited from a different approach is the Edinburgh trams inquiry. Is a judge best placed to start looking at the construction involved in lifting paving stones to lay tram tracks? Minister, you will have looked at that inquiry. What do you think went wrong with the Edinburgh trams inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Craig Hoy
From some of the evidence that we have taken, there has been a sense that ministers who feel in a tight spot, as a result of pressure from the public, will often take the route of a public inquiry because, in effect, it gets the issue off of their desk and kicks it into the long grass.
Your experience of public inquiries might be different, but is there anything that can be done to create a threshold so that politicians do not simply take what could be perceived to be the easy option, which is to hand it over to a judge and to get it off of their desk?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Craig Hoy
It is a hefty tax.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Craig Hoy
You are aware that, as the percentage is increased, people will be increasingly inventive when it comes to ways to avoid what is quite a hefty bill.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Thank you.