Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 5 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1053 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Craig Hoy

It is historical.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Craig Hoy

There is a Scottish Covid inquiry and a UK Covid inquiry, so there will be some degree of duplication. There are also asymmetrical approaches taken, for example, in relation to grooming gangs at this point in time. Louise Casey recommended to the UK Government that it should conduct an inquiry, the nature of which is still not absolutely certain, and you will be aware that there is now a lot of pressure on the Scottish Government to follow suit.

Do you believe that the victims of grooming gangs in Scotland deserve and require an inquiry? Would it be better for the England and Wales inquiry to extend its scope into Scotland? What are you currently doing to consult on what next steps the Scottish Government might take in respect of that crucial issue?

10:15  

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Craig Hoy

On a point of detail, you will be aware that one of the reasons that the Government has given for why it cannot support Scottish Conservatives’ call for a public inquiry, when we asked for it recently in a proposed amendment to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, was that Professor Alexis Jay did not believe that it was necessary.

Are you aware of any subsequent correspondence between Professor Jay and the Scottish Government in respect of the interpretation of the advice that she gave?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Craig Hoy

I have one final question. To go back to a point that Michelle Thomson made about the issue of relationships with and between interested parties, it is often said that Scotland is a village in many respects, and it is therefore difficult to bring together a group in which people may not have prior relationships with others.

For example, I was at the Herald awards on Thursday night, as were you, and one of the lawyers referred to today was glad-handing with the First Minister and other politicians. There is a cosy situation in Scotland between decision makers, including the legal establishment.

What consideration should perhaps be given to looking outwith Scotland when we seek to bring in those who might chair or be involved with public inquiries at a senior level, for the avoidance of any doubt that there might be interested parties and interrelationships that could compromise the inquiry itself?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Craig Hoy

One element that apparently—according to some of the evidence that we have taken—gives the public confidence in an inquiry when it is set up is the fact that it is judge led. What is your view on that? Do you think that alternative approaches should perhaps be taken to certain inquiries?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Craig Hoy

One of the inquiries that, by common consent, might have benefited from a different approach is the Edinburgh trams inquiry. Is a judge best placed to start looking at the construction involved in lifting paving stones to lay tram tracks? Minister, you will have looked at that inquiry. What do you think went wrong with the Edinburgh trams inquiry?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Craig Hoy

From some of the evidence that we have taken, there has been a sense that ministers who feel in a tight spot, as a result of pressure from the public, will often take the route of a public inquiry because, in effect, it gets the issue off of their desk and kicks it into the long grass.

Your experience of public inquiries might be different, but is there anything that can be done to create a threshold so that politicians do not simply take what could be perceived to be the easy option, which is to hand it over to a judge and to get it off of their desk?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Revenue Scotland

Meeting date: 18 November 2025

Craig Hoy

It is a hefty tax.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Revenue Scotland

Meeting date: 18 November 2025

Craig Hoy

You are aware that, as the percentage is increased, people will be increasingly inventive when it comes to ways to avoid what is quite a hefty bill.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Revenue Scotland

Meeting date: 18 November 2025

Craig Hoy

Thank you.