The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 850 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
That, however, feels very wishy-washy because if we have an act that received royal assent 10 years ago—and we are having four sessions on this—and the evidence demonstrates that there is a lack of implementation, that is a huge issue. Might you be willing to consider a change in approach, because you cannot manage what you do not measure?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
So that is the one question that we need to ask.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
Will you be coming back before the end of the year?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
I will make a comment on that and then ask my final question.
We are being told that BSL is very much an afterthought in education. I give the example of the Education (Scotland) Bill. BSL was not factored into it at the outset. It has only come in at the end, through amendments, and that is upsetting to the deaf community. That is take-away feedback.
I told the previous panel of witnesses that we had the Deputy First Minister in front of us next, and I asked what one question they would like us to ask her and her officials. Members can correct me if I have it wrong, but I think that their question was, “What will you do to ensure that deaf children are all trained to use BSL in Scotland?”.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
Thank you. We are discussing our work programme later, and we can build that in.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
After this session, we have Kate Forbes, the Deputy First Minister, in front of us. What one question would you like us as a committee to ask Kate Forbes?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
In terms of your asking for ideas and thoughts, we are being told from the consultation process—which was an extensive consultation process right across Scotland—that there is a shortage of education facilities, a lack of evidence of plan implementation, a lack of classes teaching BSL and a lack of interpreters. You can take that away and implement it. Thank you for recognising it. Do you have any thoughts on those four things?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
Good morning. My questions are for Dr Adam and Professor Kusters.
The BSL act has been in place since 22 October 2015, so it has been 10 years. That act of the Scottish Parliament stated that listed authorities had up to 12 months following the launch of the first national plan to publish their BSL plans. One concern that the committee has is that only 62 per cent of the local BSL plans were published in BSL at the same time as the English version. How should we hold listed authorities to account to meet the publishing requirements of the BSL act?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
To me, that is basic. You can measure other things, but you should first do the most basic thing right.
My colleague talked earlier about the comparison with Gaelic. Dr Adam talked about capacity building. We have heard from the previous two evidence sessions that there is a lack of capacity, for various reasons, whether it is a lack of interpreters, a lack of teachers or a lack of training facilities. However, when I compare Gaelic to BSL, I think that 2.7 per cent of people in Scotland speak Gaelic, and I think that 2.2 per cent are BSL users. They are very similar populations, yet the Scottish Government spends £30 million a year on Gaelic. We asked our research team, but we cannot find any evidence on how much the Scottish Government spends on BSL.
Dr Adam, you talked about lip service. That is lip service, and you cannot manage what you do not measure. As the British Deaf Association said, there is limited funding to support any development and implementation of the act. What is your view of that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tess White
You said that it is lip service, so it is almost aspirational but there is no implementation. The rubber has not hit the road yet.