The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1963 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I would say that the word “negligence” suggests that you do not know what you are doing, and that is a problem.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
With regard to vicarious liability, what is your view of contractors that do work for the main company, for example?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Therefore, you think that, if a company is following a proper process, it is the contracting company that—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Could the bill have any unintended consequences? For example, is there any danger of companies moving their headquarters away from Scotland because there is an ecocide law in place?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Could there be any other unintended consequences?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
The threshold of liability for senior responsible officials of an organisation is consent or connivance. The committee has heard that “consent, connivance or neglect” would be more in keeping with comparable provisions. Does the Government have a view on that? Should neglect be added?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
The committee has heard concerns that defining the responsibility of individuals in relation to the corresponding type of organisation could leave scope for non-senior staff—middle managers, for example—to be prosecuted. Do you think that that is right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
However, if a contracting company was acting in a way that was—I will stay away from the word “negligent”—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes. Therefore, the responsibility would rest with the contracting company. Maybe, if the contractor had gone a bit rogue, the contractor would be responsible.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
So you think that that is covered.