The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 958 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
You are currently looking at that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
You know the importance of clarity in that regard when collecting that data for equality monitoring. At the moment, that is one area in which there is a big gap. Are you fully aware of that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
It is good to hear that you place importance on that—that having that monitoring, and having good data on biological sex, is important. Do you agree that the Scottish Government should therefore withdraw the 2021 guidance, which still encourages data collection based on self-ID?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I asked that question because you were very clear that you are accepting the judgment and the fact that you are following the law. However, this clearly states that you are not following the law. I know that you spoke earlier about the word “how”, but how is the Scottish Government interpreting that “how”? The law is the law. The Supreme Court judgment was very clear, hence why I am asking you these questions today, minister.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
It has also emerged that the Scottish Government has allocated £13 million of taxpayers’ money to LGBT Youth Scotland. LGBT Youth Scotland has begun operating in primary schools, which is something that I have been contacted about by many concerned parents from my area, East Dunbartonshire. Apart from that, LGBT Youth Scotland refuses to abide by the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of the word “woman”. Why is the Scottish Government providing funding to this organisation that refuses to follow the law? What are the Government’s procurement rules when it comes to handing out money to such organisations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I am sorry to interrupt you, minister, but I have to be very clear on what the question was about. It was about LGBT Youth Scotland, which refuses to abide by the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of the word “woman”. You said very clearly earlier that you follow the law and you accept the judgment. This organisation is refusing to do that. What example is that setting to the children, that you are bringing in an organisation to deliver to young children in schools which does not abide by the law? I would not be bringing this up if parents in East Dunbartonshire had not brought it up. They are very concerned. I got another email today and I have brought this up many times. They are very concerned about that organisation.
I know that a lot of good work goes on and that having clarity around understanding different backgrounds is important, but that organisation is refusing to abide by the law. To pay out £13 million to an organisation that does not want to abide by the law is not a good example to be setting those children.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you for that information. Convener, I—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning. Thank you for the information that you have provided so far. Can you confirm that the commission has changed its position on recording sex based on self-identification—which has been the case since the publication of the chief statistician’s guidance in 2021—and that you agree that it is necessary to collect data on biological sex for equality monitoring?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have a bit of a technical supplementary. Section 112(3) of the Equality Act 2010 states:
“B commits an offence if B knowingly or recklessly makes a statement mentioned in subsection (2)(a) which is false or misleading in a material respect.”
Does EHRC consider that public bodies and the Scottish Government are potentially at risk of legal action if they continue to follow the 2011 code of practice? Given that the code is now clearly advising action, does the commission believe that the Scottish Government is out of line with the law as clarified by the Supreme Court ruling? Having advised the Scottish Government that it must abide by the ruling, disregard the 2011 code of practice and not wait for the new code, do you consider that civil servants or ministers might be committing an offence under section 112(3) if they fail to act in accordance with the law as clarified?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
You would be guiding them, minister, as the Scottish Government.