The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 788 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
Until May 2022, I held a role as a Highland councillor and received a salary for that, which I donated to local charities in the Highlands.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
Given that there are 49 days for MPs to resolve their conflict, I still wonder why there is not a similar arrangement for councillors. If we believe that holding two roles is not the best situation and that we want to avoid by-elections, why not require that a councillor give up their role within 186 days?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
My questions have been answered, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
For my part, when I was a councillor and MSP at the same time, it was not easy to hold both roles—I would compare it to being a minister at the same time as being an MSP—but a driver for me was not wanting to leave a vacancy on the local planning committee.
I am curious, though, minister. You say that the by-election concern is the main driver for the 372 days, but if a councillor were to step down within six months of the full election, there would not have to be a by-election. So, why is it 372 days instead of 186 days?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
It does, in a sense, because I did not want to put my ward in the position of having such a vacancy. All that I would say is that it feels inconsistent.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Are you confident that, in that kind of set-up, you would be able to enforce, where necessary, if there were complaints about how a community-led partnership was operating?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
I would like to go back to our discussion about enforcement. We have heard evidence that there is more focus on residency than on what is happening on crofts. What are your thoughts on the current duties? Are they where they need to be? I have had representations from people on Eigg, who say that the 32km residency limit includes part of the mainland—whether that points to residency might be in question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Great. Will that consolidation make it easier for you to spot patterns and consider where future work might be needed?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Let me turn to powers. Stakeholders have raised concerns that restricting ownership of owner-occupied crofts to individuals could block community-led or partnership models. What is the commission’s view on such a change?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
This issue was touched on a little bit earlier. At present, crofting has two registers—the register of crofts and the crofting register. Will maintaining both be necessary, or should the longer-term aim be to move to a single, unified system?