The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1189 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
What do you foresee as the balance between the proactive and reactive approaches that Healthcare Improvement Scotland will take? How much of its work will involve going out and having regular inspections or reacting to intelligence, and how will that balance be struck?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
Thinking about all the players that need to be involved in counterfeit products—you mentioned environmental health officers in relation to licences—I wonder whether there is a role for Police Scotland here, too. We know that these things already happen, but what will happen with regard to the black market and unregistered premises?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
It would be helpful to have a route map published and on the record in the lead-up to the regulations coming into force. Are you content to do that? After all, it would be good for the industry to have a staged understanding of what is expected and at what point. There might even be an element of education in the scaled-up improvement notices that are expected. Are you content to look at that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning. A death can lead to a very troubling time for a family. Some of the responses that we received to our call for views expressed concern about the possibility that the new procedure might cause delays. Can you reassure us that the new process would cause minimal delays—or no real delays—in the system?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
That is very helpful.
Do witnesses agree that clear guidance and processes should be developed, to inform those who request an additional review? How could that work in practice? Obviously, it is a change, and a lot of people do not know that the arrangements exist anyway. How should we communicate that to individuals?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
Following on from enforcement, I want to focus on the unregulated aspects that we know will be created here. We have heard concerns that the bill might not give HIS sufficient powers, systems or resources to undertake effective enforcement in unregistered settings. What additional resource and support will Healthcare Improvement Scotland receive to enforce the bill’s provisions effectively, given the scale of expectations? That relates both to the regulated setting as well as settings outside of that, where there might be underground rogue traders.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
The advance registration procedure was introduced recently. Do you foresee that it would still be available in those circumstances, or is there anything to prevent that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
Would that take place when a registrar is dealing with a bereaved family and things that are said in the meeting lead the registrar to believe that there might be an avenue for that type of review to be requested?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Elena Whitham
Jim Murdoch, you spoke about East Ayrshire health and social care partnership’s dying well strategy. How do you foresee those who are working within the partnership being able to communicate the new review process effectively to people and to support them in it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning. The committee has been quite concerned about the low awareness of the advocacy service over the past few years. When people were supported, the advocates did a sterling job, so it is brilliant to hear that they are going to be TUPE transferred over into your organisation so that you will retain those people and skills.
On 27 November, the committee heard from Edel Harris, who authored the independent review of adult disability payment. She, too, found that there was low awareness of the advocacy service. Everything that you have said so far gives me a lot of comfort about the way in which you are going to carve out the new service’s identity. Can you add anything to that? We want to ensure that everybody who needs to be aware of the service is aware of it.