The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1271 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Good morning to the minister and the panel. I have a couple of questions with regard to the principles with which the Government has approached taxation. Is it appropriate to alter the basis of taxation retrospectively, as the order that is before us will do?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Do you accept that that goes against the Government’s approach to date, which has looked at certainty and wider stakeholder engagement on taxation? Is the approach purely due to the circumstances of the pandemic or is it a direction of travel that ministers are considering?
10:15Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Okay. Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Good morning. I have some questions on the take-up of low-income benefits. I know that the figures are estimates, but the strategy suggests that the take-up rate for the funeral support payment is 59 per cent. What work has been undertaken to evaluate why that is the case? When most people are arranging a funeral for a loved one, their discussions will be very sector specific, so why is the figure so low? What is being done to work with the sector and promote the benefit within the services that it delivers? It would seem that, at that time, there is an easy opportunity to have a conversation and raise the possibility of people accessing that benefit.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Miles Briggs
I am not sure whether you will have time to answer this before we suspend the meeting. With regard to strengthening portfolio working across Government, one of the key issues is where people can find the information. Foysol Choudhury mentioned the baby box. We know that 66 per cent of parents welcomed the fact that it included information about breastfeeding and postnatal depression. Is that approach being looked at to see whether that life event could include advertising for different benefits—the five family benefits that you mentioned—as Marie McNair touched on earlier?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Further to my question, the recent Scottish Commission on Social Security report on adult disability payments recommended a focus on active referrals, rather than just signposting, as the way forward. Will a key part of the strategy to develop pathways be to actively refer people and not just signpost them?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Miles Briggs
With that in mind, why has the Government decided not to include targets for uptake in the strategy, which could drive forward uptake of all the new benefits? What is the rationale behind that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Part of the discussion that we had on last Monday’s visit to Social Security Scotland was about groups that might find it difficult to access or fill out forms, or that have technology challenges. On the people who are not applying, what work has been done on identifying whether those are the key reasons for people not wanting to fill out huge numbers of forms? Are there also language or reading barriers?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Miles Briggs
No. Both my questions have been answered, so I am happy to move on.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Good morning to the panel. My questions are about the workload for assessors and valuation committees. First, will you outline your thoughts on the potential implications for that workload and the system if we allow coronavirus-related MCC appeals? I ask Alastair Kirkwood to comment first, and then Charles Golding. If anyone else wants to comment, they should type the letter R in the chat box.