The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 882 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Lorna Slater
I will not ask everyone to come in on every question if they do not have anything to add.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Lorna Slater
I will ask a few different questions, if the convener will indulge me. I will start on the point about careers advice, which we have just been covering, and move on to the flexibility of the system. I will then close on apprenticeships, because I know that some of my colleagues have questions about those.
We have touched on some of the solutions to the joining-up problem that Sandy Begbie highlighted, whereby we have this enormous potential and need for skills opportunities in Scotland but both young people and mid-career transitioners are not finding them or are not aware of them. In my younger days, when I was a young STEM ambassador—I am an electrical and mechanical engineer—I went into schools to talk to kids about engineering. I would show them pictures of the work that we were doing, and it was very far removed from their experience, especially in more deprived areas. The kids had aspirations to be dog walkers; they could not imagine themselves operating machinery, let alone designing it. There is a gap midway between jobs requiring a master’s degree in engineering and being a dog walker, which we do not seem to be filling.
I have frequently heard criticism about careers advice. Sandy Begbie said that it is patchy, and Paul Campbell said that the DYW co-ordinators are not there. Is that the missing piece of the puzzle? How important is that work?
10:15Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you very much. I will hand back to the convener and let other members pick up on the subject of apprenticeships.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Okay—so it is the same.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
No, that is fine. The second part was about transparency and accountability, and I think that you covered that—unless you want to add more detail.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
For completeness, how are their budgets allocated and how is scrutiny of the Crown entities done?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Where does scrutiny of their performance and functions go?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Brilliant—thank you very much.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
So, for example, the rent for their premises would come out of their budgets. The premises are not provided directly by the Parliament or through Government buildings. Is that correct?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
One of the topics that we have been talking about is the constituent experience. If you have a problem—if something has gone wrong with a public service—where do you go? In Scotland, the question is whether you speak to the ombudsman or the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. How does that work in New Zealand? If something has gone wrong, how does a New Zealand citizen know where to go? Is there a front page, a dashboard or a one-stop shop from which they can be correctly directed to the Ombudsman or the Human Rights Commission, for example?