The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 778 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Lorna Slater
I have a couple of specific questions on which, I hope, you will be able to give some information. I am interested to hear how you feel about the business and regulatory impact assessments, with respect to the review that has been part of the process. Do they properly and adequately incorporate the benefits of co-operative and other inclusive and democratic business models? If they do not, what changes need to be made to the BRIAs to make sure that those benefits are accounted for?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Lorna Slater
My final question is more for Colin and Sara. Within your organisations, you must have members that are co-operatives and other more democratic business models. Do you sense that there is a difference in how they participate and in the kind of support that they get?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Lorna Slater
The witnesses have sort of answered what was going to be my second question, so I will deviate a bit.
When you notice challenges, whether those are as simple as a drop-down menu—although I know that such things are never simple—or an issue such as Business Gateway or the enterprise agencies just not directing people down that path, who do you go to? I ask because you were not part of the new deal for business group, so do you have a mechanism to flag that up and say to Scottish Enterprise that it has not included you?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Lorna Slater
It seems that there are two themes developing. One is around how we mainstream those businesses. That probably means getting Business Gateway, the enterprise agencies and so on to make sure that they are included. I would be interested to hear from witnesses whether they have ideas on how mainstreaming could be better achieved. Please feel free to write to us later, in relation to that.
The other theme is innovation, so there is the point about mainstreaming of existing practice, and a point about opening up the space for innovation in other business models, as well. Does that seem to capture it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Lorna Slater
I am very interested in what you are saying. It is really useful, and thank you for being so candid with us.
You mentioned in your opening remarks that some of your work is similar to the casework that MSPs undertake when supporting our constituents. In that sense, I suppose that we can imagine that you are facing in the same direction as Parliament, which is holding Government and public services to account and supporting people with their interactions with them. You also report to Parliament. Do you see yourself as an extension of the capabilities of Parliament? Where do you think that you fit into the wider landscape and in the structure of public trust?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Lorna Slater
That is very helpful. I have one last question. If we look at this from the perspective of someone who wants to make a complaint and from a the customer experience perspective, the landscape is quite complicated as to who to go to if someone wants to whistleblow, to complain about a parliamentarian and so on. We have discussed with previous witnesses the idea of having a one-stop shop for complaints as a hypothetical umbrella office of public trust. It does not matter what has gone wrong, people would have one place to go to. That organisation would combine all the supported bodies and the whistleblowing functions. All those things would be in one place. What is your view of a hypothetical one-stop shop as an office of public trust that combines some of those functions?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Lorna Slater
We are auditing audits.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you very much.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Lorna Slater
You said that you do not get a lot of complaints about Parliament. We have taken evidence from the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland, and they told us that they get quite a lot of them. That interesting point is a large part of what we are discussing—that is, there are different places to go depending on who someone wants to complain about, but clearly there is overlap if someone can bring a complaint to more than one of those bodies.