The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1114 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
I want to go back over something that Pauline McNeill said, to ensure that my understanding of the point is right. Paragraph 38 of your joint submission says:
“As drafted, the Bill would criminalise a family member, friend—or stranger—who shared a child victim’s social media post disclosing they were the victim of a sexual crime. They would not necessarily benefit from the public domain defence already discussed”.
Would that take account of a case in which, for example, someone’s auntie, who should know that they are under 18, has shared their post? Would we be legislating to criminalise the auntie for sharing a post that the complainer had made of their own free will?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
I want to follow up on the points that Pauline McNeill raised initially about the varying experiences of witnesses, as well as Russell Findlay’s point about the requirement for legislation. We have heard from witnesses about the different experiences that they have had. The Crown Office’s submission says that, when decisions are made about how a witness provides evidence,
“there should be sufficient time for a court visit and meaningful discussions between the witness and the prosecutor about special measures.”
In another part, it says:
“prosecutors act in the public interest and do not represent individual complainers or witnesses.”
Do all advocate deputes support spending extra time with complainers to explain the processes, or does it come down to what you said earlier about resources?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Sheriff Cubie, do you have any comments on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
I mean if the child did not make a complaint but they put out the post and it was shared by their friends and family. If the person who shared the post was over 18 and they knew that the child who put out the original post was under 18, could someone other than that child just go in and prosecute them?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
So, even if the child did not bring a complaint, the auntie could still be prosecuted for sharing the post.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
So, it could happen.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Is there a lack of pace? Every business needs transformation to keep it viable. You mentioned a lack of communication with staff, Auditor General. Is there a lack of pace in the board and the NHS more widely on transformation to ensure that recurring savings are made?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
I come to my last question. We are always talking about sharing best practice. Are there any models of good practice in other boards that are facing similar challenges, from which NHS Forth Valley could learn?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Good morning, Auditor General. Paragraph 4, on page 4, which is the start of the summary, states:
“This report highlights concerns raised by a range of review bodies in 2022/23, in relation to the governance, leadership and culture of NHS Forth Valley and the progress the board is making in addressing these issues.”
Can you give us more detail on the nature of those concerns?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
My colleagues will ask further questions on governance later. Paragraph 5 of the report says:
“In 2022/23, NHS Forth Valley delivered a break-even position, achieving an underspend of £0.229 million against its Revenue Resource Limit … However, the board experienced significant financial challenges, during the course of the year, due to ongoing capacity and staffing pressures, increases in medicine costs, ongoing Covid-19 legacy expenditure”
and
“delays in delivering recurring savings plans”.
Why have there been delays in delivering the recurring savings plans?