Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 5 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1114 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

I want to go back over something that Pauline McNeill said, to ensure that my understanding of the point is right. Paragraph 38 of your joint submission says:

“As drafted, the Bill would criminalise a family member, friend—or stranger—who shared a child victim’s social media post disclosing they were the victim of a sexual crime. They would not necessarily benefit from the public domain defence already discussed”.

Would that take account of a case in which, for example, someone’s auntie, who should know that they are under 18, has shared their post? Would we be legislating to criminalise the auntie for sharing a post that the complainer had made of their own free will?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

I want to follow up on the points that Pauline McNeill raised initially about the varying experiences of witnesses, as well as Russell Findlay’s point about the requirement for legislation. We have heard from witnesses about the different experiences that they have had. The Crown Office’s submission says that, when decisions are made about how a witness provides evidence,

“there should be sufficient time for a court visit and meaningful discussions between the witness and the prosecutor about special measures.”

In another part, it says:

“prosecutors act in the public interest and do not represent individual complainers or witnesses.”

Do all advocate deputes support spending extra time with complainers to explain the processes, or does it come down to what you said earlier about resources?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

Sheriff Cubie, do you have any comments on that?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

I mean if the child did not make a complaint but they put out the post and it was shared by their friends and family. If the person who shared the post was over 18 and they knew that the child who put out the original post was under 18, could someone other than that child just go in and prosecute them?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

So, even if the child did not bring a complaint, the auntie could still be prosecuted for sharing the post.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

So, it could happen.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of NHS Forth Valley”

Meeting date: 25 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

Is there a lack of pace? Every business needs transformation to keep it viable. You mentioned a lack of communication with staff, Auditor General. Is there a lack of pace in the board and the NHS more widely on transformation to ensure that recurring savings are made?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of NHS Forth Valley”

Meeting date: 25 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

I come to my last question. We are always talking about sharing best practice. Are there any models of good practice in other boards that are facing similar challenges, from which NHS Forth Valley could learn?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of NHS Forth Valley”

Meeting date: 25 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

Good morning, Auditor General. Paragraph 4, on page 4, which is the start of the summary, states:

“This report highlights concerns raised by a range of review bodies in 2022/23, in relation to the governance, leadership and culture of NHS Forth Valley and the progress the board is making in addressing these issues.”

Can you give us more detail on the nature of those concerns?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of NHS Forth Valley”

Meeting date: 25 January 2024

Sharon Dowey

My colleagues will ask further questions on governance later. Paragraph 5 of the report says:

“In 2022/23, NHS Forth Valley delivered a break-even position, achieving an underspend of £0.229 million against its Revenue Resource Limit … However, the board experienced significant financial challenges, during the course of the year, due to ongoing capacity and staffing pressures, increases in medicine costs, ongoing Covid-19 legacy expenditure”

and

“delays in delivering recurring savings plans”.

Why have there been delays in delivering the recurring savings plans?