- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 21 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will confirm in writing to the partners of the Project Brave ferry project that it will begin the process of making the necessary legislative amendment to formally authorise Grangemouth as an inland Border Control Post.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-40003 on 8 September 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 21 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of reports that it is the responsibility of the Scottish Government to make the necessary legislative amendment to formally authorise Grangemouth as an inland Border Control Post, whether it will provide a timescale for the completion of this exercise.
Answer
The Scottish Government continues to support the development of our ports including the potential for new direct freight and passenger ferry services linking Scotland to Europe.
The partners in Project Brave have requested that legislation is changed to mirror the legislation currently used in England. Project Brave representatives have been advised that aligning with English legislation would still not permit the use of Grangemouth for goods received at Rosyth.
The legislative situation is complex, and SG officials are happy to continue to engage with Project Brave.
Whilst the Scottish Government welcomes the recent announcement of an outline SPS agreement with the EU, further detail of the eventual finalised SPS agreement remains to be agreed.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 July 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 26 August 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what representations it will make to ensure that television coverage of the Tour de France is free to air when the event comes to Scotland in 2027.
Answer
Broadcast rights are ultimately a matter for the event owner, Amaury Sports Organisation, but the Scottish Government will continue to work collaboratively with all partners to develop opportunities to maximise exposure of the event, and ensure it can be enjoyed by as many people as possible.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 July 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 19 August 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what the costs were for the security resources that were dedicated to supporting President Trump’s visit to Scotland in July 2025.
Answer
The Scottish Government worked collaboratively on arrangements for the recent visit of President Trump to Scotland, and recognises the hard work of the police officers and police staff who delivered this complex and large-scale operation, which ensured a safe and secure visit by the President.
Operational decisions around the planning and delivery of the operation, and the deployment of police officers, were for the Chief Constable. Police Scotland is still determining the costs of this complex policing operation, and they do not expect the final costs to be available until later in the year.
The Scottish Government is engaging with the UK Government to explore the options for funding the costs incurred by Police Scotland and wider public sector partners including the Scottish Government, in supporting the Presidential visit. In the interests of openness and transparency the Scottish Government has committed to making details of the costs publicly available, once they are known.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 02 July 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 29 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the level of skills and abilities of children starting primary school, and whether there has been a recorded decline in these over the last 10 years, including (a) cognitive, (b) motor, (c) practical and (d) social skills.
Answer
Public Health Scotland collects data provided by NHS Health Boards on child health reviews as part of the Universal Health Visiting Pathway. These reviews, which take place at 13-15 months, 27-30 months and 4-5 years, cover the following domains:
1.Speech, language and communication development
2.Emotional/behavioural development
3.Personal/social development
4.Fine motor development
5.Gross motor development
6.Vision
7.Hearing
8.Problem solving development
The 4-5 year review was first introduced in April 2017 and implemented by Health Boards between April 2017 and 2020. Therefore, data is only available for all Health Boards for the past 5 years. The latest available data is published by Public Health Scotland here: https://publichealthscotland.scot/publications/early-child-development/
Coverage for the 4-5 year review has increased substantially, from 23% in 2017-18 to 76% in 2023-24. Therefore, comparisons between these time periods need to be made with caution.
Further detail on the Universal Health Visiting Pathway is available here: https://www.gov.scot/publications/universal-health-visiting-pathway-scotland-pre-birth-pre-school.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 27 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the policy recommendations in the University of Manchester report, On Hydrogen, including their potential impact on future (a) policy and (b) publicly funded research on hydrogen in Scotland.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises that the work of universities, research institutes and industry play a valuable role in the development of the hydrogen sector, and we routinely engage with relevant academic outputs of universities as we continue to develop our policies and assess research needs in this emerging sector.
Hydrogen policy officials met recently with several of the academics from Manchester University who contributed to the collection of papers in their wide ranging ‘On Hydrogen’ report and will take these papers into consideration as part of the broader research landscape in the hydrogen sector. The Scottish Government continues to welcome engagement with universities regarding hydrogen and is fully committed to helping the Scottish hydrogen sector develop and grow.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 27 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the University of Manchester report, On Hydrogen, what consideration it has given to the potential role that the recently established large industrial clusters could play in the decarbonisation of small industrial emitters.
Answer
Hydrogen policy officials met recently with several of the academics from Manchester University to discuss the findings in the On Hydrogen report and we will take these papers into consideration as part of our ongoing studies of the broader research landscape in the hydrogen sector.
Our industrial clusters will play an important role in achieving our vision of a decarbonised, successful, industrial sector. In some cases, decarbonisation will mean adoption of a range of new technologies, including low carbon hydrogen.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its next steps will be once the current pollinator strategy ends, including how it plans to evaluate the performance of the strategy.
Answer
The current Pollinator Strategy runs from 2017 to 2027 and has been a successful catalyst for local authorities, communities, and other organisations to come together to improve existing pollinator habitat and improve linkages between them. In 2026, NatureScot will begin discussion with a range of stakeholders over the successes of the current Strategy, the elements which need to be built on over the coming 10 years covered by the second Strategy, and new initiatives which may need to be taken forward.
NatureScot has recently published the annual Pollinator Strategy Progress Report which is available here: Pollinator Strategy - 2024 Progress Report | NatureScot. Evaluation of future Pollinator Strategies will be taken forward within the context of the wider Monitoring and Evaluation Framework which is being developed for the Scottish Biodiversity Strategy details of which are available here: Biodiversity strategy and delivery plan: governance, monitoring and evaluation - gov.scot.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 July 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 18 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether Scottish Forestry and Forestry and Land Scotland have published plans to mitigate any impacts of the larch removal policy to control phytophthora ramorum to ensure important breeding raptor and red squirrel populations are adequately protected, and that woodlands or suitable structure, extent and tree species composition remain in situ once diseased larch is removed.
Answer
Scottish Forestry (SF) have published “Advice on replanting sites affected by “Phytopthora ramorum”. This includes guidance on the range of different species that the owner can match to their site conditions and constraints. This gives individual owners options to help match the objectives and requirements of a site to suitable tree species.
Any felling should adhere to the requirements of the United Kingdom Forestry Standard (UKFS) and existing environmental regulation. Legislation relating to plant health matters does not override other legislative requirements – and vice versa. The Phytopthora ramorum on larch action plan also emphasises that exemptions to SPHN deadlines may be required where there are conflicts between legislation or other key principles of sustainable forest management (SFM) for example breeding seasons. Decisions on these will be taken on a case by case basis and are at the discretion of SF Conservancies.
Forestry and Land Scotland (FLS) have not published specific plans to mitigate any impacts of the larch removal policy on Scotland’s National Forests and Land. FLS do consider the implications of impacts when deciding when and how to replant sites to meet objectives and requirements, and these are published in the separate Land Management Plans and associated documents submitted to SF. Land Management Plans are produced collaboratively by local planning and environment teams and balance multiple objectives. Plans consider raptor and red squirrel populations where present, and where larch removal is a major objective, generally aim to retain as much other mature conifer as reasonably practicable, considering all plan objectives in the round.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 July 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 18 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether Scottish Forestry carried out a strategic environmental assessment of its larch removal policy for the control of phytophthora ramorum and to consider what potential impacts this removal would have on breeding raptor populations and red squirrels in particular.
Answer
Scottish Forestry have undertaken a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) for Scotland’s Forestry Strategy, which includes consideration of pests and diseases including Phytophthora ramorum and the legislation relating to plant health. Overall, and with appropriate adherence to the requirements of the United Kingdom Forestry Standard (UKFS) and existing environmental regulation, effects were expected to be positive. Legislation relating to plant health matters does not override other legislative requirements – and vice versa. The Phytophthora ramorum on larch action plan was developed in conjunction with scientists and industry representatives and reiterates adherence to Scotland’s Forest strategy and the need for due diligence to identify sites that will require to be protected.