The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you. To get us under way, I invite Graham Simpson to lead off.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
I will now turn to Joe FitzPatrick, who has some questions to put to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 31st meeting in 2025 of the Public Audit Committee.
Under agenda item 1, do members of the committee agree to take agenda items 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 this morning in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
You have said a couple of times already this morning that your concern is that there is no evidence that the board can achieve financial sustainability. How has it come to that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you. We now have a final couple of questions from the deputy convener, Jamie Greene.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much indeed.
We have another evidence session up and coming on NHS Grampian, which was also the subject of a section 22 report. Before we turn to that, I will take this opportunity to thank Fiona Mitchell-Knight, the Auditor General and Leigh Johnston for the evidence that you have given us on the position of NHS Ayrshire and Arran.
I suppose that, for context, we need to understand the point that you made towards the end, which is that not all the 14 territorial health boards have required brokerage. The question for us as the Public Audit Committee is why some boards have required it and others have not. Maybe there are fundamental issues about the funding formula—who knows? I think that there are some wider points that we need to get a better understanding of.
Thank you very much indeed for what has been a very useful session for us. I will now suspend the meeting while we change witnesses.
10:49 Meeting suspended.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
That is a moot point and a question for our times, is it not?
I now invite the deputy convener to ask some questions.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
I have a question before we leave this area. Auditor General, you have mentioned the KPMG report a couple of times. One of the key messages that the auditor attached to the report is that staffing levels are out of kilter with the number of beds in NHS Grampian. The report goes on to cite different grades. It says, for example, that there has been a 16.4 per cent increase of nursing whole-time-equivalent staff in the past three years, a 17.8 per cent increase of medical and dental WTEs, an 18.2 per cent increase among the administrative staff, and an increase of over 33 per cent when we get to other therapeutic staff. KPMG’s argument is that there are far too many people employed by NHS Grampian and that its cost base is out of line; it says that that is a deficit driver that it would not expect and so on. However, if the narrative is that these are positions that were previously outsourced to agencies at great expense and have now been brought in-house, that might be a good thing. Do you have a view on that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
I am not quite sure that that is what I took from the KPMG report. You have said, and it is in your section 22 report, that NHS Grampian has the lowest bed base per 1,000 population and so on, yet one of the things that is highlighted in the KPMG report is that there has been a further reduction in the number of beds available in NHS Grampian. It also goes on to talk about how artificial intelligence could be brought in to replace some of what it describes as lower grade staff. I am not quite sure whether we would sign up to that, but there are some ideas out there about how things can be streamlined, are there not?.
I guess that there are broader questions here about bed numbers, which is an issue that came up in our discussion about NHS Ayrshire and Arran. Is reducing the number of beds one of the Government’s targets as a means of driving down the cost base in territorial health boards?