The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 882 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
In its 2021 manifesto, the Scottish National Party promised to reduce endometriosis diagnosis times to less than 12 months by the end of 2025, yet waiting times are still eight and a half years. Following the publication of the women’s health plan report, will that target be met?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Douglas Ross is right. In Eyemouth, aggressive gulls have attacked young children and they are a blight on businesses that are trying to trade in difficult conditions.
The issue is that the licensing scheme is impractical. Can the minister look at the licensing scheme itself? How can he support communities that are looking for a strategic approach to controlling gulls through management plans, improved signage and gull-proof bins?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Will the member take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Is Emma Harper content that Scotland’s public sector and public bodies are following the law on single-sex spaces correctly?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Will Evelyn Tweed take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
I have not said anything yet, but yes.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
I will conclude, Presiding Officer.
The Scottish Government must issue a public sector directive instructing all schools, hospitals and other public institutions to uphold single-sex spaces for biological women and girls.
16:34Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
In 2021, in response to a question on gender reform, Nicola Sturgeon shocked those watching by saying that women’s concerns were “not valid”. Those irresponsible comments sparked fury, and here we are again, being questioned about protecting more than 50 per cent of the population and about the fundamental importance of the protection of single-sex spaces for women and girls in our public sector.
Under the SNP Government—
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Lorna Slater’s views on single-sex spaces and protecting women are as poorly thought-out as her deposit return scheme. They are confusing and aggressive.
Under the SNP Government, we have seen a reckless disregard for the safety, dignity and privacy of women in Scotland’s hospitals, schools and other public settings. Let us be clear: single-sex spaces are legal. The Equality Act 2010 explicitly allows for the provision of single-sex services where it is necessary and proportionate. John Swinney himself has admitted that and that the law is on the side of women. The problem is that the SNP Government refuses to enforce it.
Instead, public bodies across Scotland—including our schools and hospitals—are being pressured into adopting dangerous gender self-ID policies that put women and girls at risk. Women’s voices, in this case, have been ignored and victims’ experiences dismissed. When concerns are raised, SNP ministers—and other parties—refuse to engage. A couple of weeks ago, John Swinney said that he did not regret supporting the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill.
Hospitals should be places of safety and healing. Instead, under the SNP, they have become places of fear for women. The Women’s Rights Network has compiled disturbing data from Police Scotland, which shows that, between 2019 and 2024, there were nearly 300 incidents of sexual assault and rape in Scottish hospitals. In 2024 alone, there were 23 reports of sexual assault within NHS Borders hospitals, almost all of which—19 incidents—occurred at the Borders general hospital. If, as NHS Borders reported, only three cases were recorded but 23 were reported, we must ask how many more cases have gone unrecorded, unreported and ignored.
Let us not forget the case of Sandie Peggie, an NHS nurse for 30 years at the Victoria hospital in Kirkcaldy who was suspended after objecting to sharing a changing room with a male-born person identifying as a woman. Both Dr Upton and NHS Fife petitioned for the tribunal to be held in private, unlike other employment tribunals, which are public. Just think: holding it behind closed doors would have been more convenient for the Scottish Government if we were not having this debate today.