Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 104,438 results relating to "Followed 2020 auf anfrage"

|
You may wish to search for the following phrase:

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 19 January 2005

Public Petitions Committee, 19 Jan 2005

The Deputy Minister for Health and Community Care's response says:"Following a Court decision in January 2004, formal reference to the European Court of Justice … was sent in March 2004.
Official Report Meeting date: 15 December 2004

Plenary, 15 Dec 2004

On inquiring at the Scottish Parliament information centre, I was informed that the document is embargoed until after the minister sits down at the end of his speech in the debate that follows. The document is therefore not available to members or to inform the debate.Presiding Officer, you will be aware that at yesterday's meeting of the Parliamentary Bure...
Official Report Meeting date: 14 December 2004

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 14 Dec 2004

On page 13 of the legal brief, members will see that it is suggested that we should ask the Executive the following question:"A number of the provisions of the Schedules for example paragraphs 3(2) to (4) and 8(4) of Schedule 1 and paragraphs 2(2) to (4) and 7(4) of Schedule 2 include provisions that are already to be found in the parent Act.
Official Report Meeting date: 9 December 2004

Plenary, 09 Dec 2004

It will then be for local councils and national park authorities to draw up core path plans for their respective areas within the following three years. The establishment of a core path network is a vital component in allowing access rights under the 2003 act, although such rights are not confined to that network.
Official Report Meeting date: 29 June 2004

Local Government and Transport Committee, 29 Jun 2004

Before I introduce the witnesses for our first evidence-taking session, I will deal with two brief items of business. Following the passage of the Local Governance (Scotland) Bill last week, I put on record my thanks—supported, I imagine, by the rest of the committee—to Eugene Windsor and the rest of the clerking team for the work that they did on the bill....
Official Report Meeting date: 28 June 2004

Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill Committee, 28 Jun 2004

We record all our decisions in the minutes, even if we have a private meeting. Does that help? We should just follow normal practice and take the item in private.
Official Report Meeting date: 4 March 2004

Plenary, 04 Mar 2004

I promised then that I would revisit the matter.With reference to the relevant parts of the Parliament's standing orders, will you rule on whether it is competent for an MSP to lodge a parliamentary question to the Executive on a decision that was taken by MSPs following a debate in which this Parliament might have been misled about the legality of the acti...
Official Report Meeting date: 3 March 2004

Public Petitions Committee, 03 Mar 2004

We should write to the Executive and ask why it is not following the same road and why it wants to consider how many people might be interested in rights of audience or rights to conduct litigation.
Official Report Meeting date: 11 November 2003

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 11 Nov 2003

That list is becoming longer and longer. Yes. Are members agreed to follow option (a) in relation to item 2?
Official Report Meeting date: 6 November 2003

Plenary, 06 Nov 2003

There has been correspondence—not, I think, with the Scottish Executive Education Department but with the First Minister's office.That is being followed up. There have been no meetings as yet, but the suggestion that has been made is interesting and worthy of pursuit.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].