This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
What concerns a lot of people is that, although there may be an overall drop, there may be a division, with more people choosing to be abstinent and a smaller group of people who have really quite chronic problems.
I am very eager and enthusiastic to see not all the consultation responses in particular—they will be published imminently—but the draft bill that will be introduced to the Parliament, because that will clearly outline what powers may or may not be available and where they will sit.
There is an undoubted risk that the assumptions that we have in the proposal may or may not be sufficient to reflect the market conditions at the time.
We often talk about data as though there is not a person behind it, but there very much is, and there may be potential implications for that individual.
I should also clarify that the revised framework document says that any subsequent chief executive may or may not be a secondment from the Scottish Government.
Clinical points might mean that there is no justification for doing so because there may be sufficient vaccine protection for a sufficient length of time.