That is necessary as a consequence of the amendments to sections 4 and 5, because section 7 relies on the wider compatibility framework elsewhere in the bill.Section 7 is about the courts being able to remove or limit any retrospective effect of a decision about incompatible legislation, so it stands to reason that references to incompatible legislation in section 7 need to be narrowed to correspond with the narrower focus of sections 4 and 5.As with group 1, the amendments have the full support of COSLA, the representative body of the bill’s key stakeholder.