Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 15 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1675 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 11:13]

Urgent Questions

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Douglas Ross

What?

Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 11:13]

Urgent Questions

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Douglas Ross

Come on!

Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 11:13]

Points of Order

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Douglas Ross

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I decided to raise a point of order to get advice from you and so that the Government front bench can listen and, I hope, respond.

The Presiding Officer will recall that, on 27 November, the Parliament had to meet in an emergency session to rush through legislation to fix a mistake in the Non-Domestic Rates (Liability for Unoccupied Properties) (Scotland) Bill that the Scottish National Party took through the Parliament. During the course of the consideration of the bill, we found out that the Government knew about the issue months or weeks before it originally said that it did. There was confusion everywhere: Graeme Dey had to correct the Official Report and Ivan McKee had to be asked three or four times before we could finally get an answer from him. I lodged amendments to the bill in order to get important information from the Government. We heard from all sides of the chamber that transparency was paramount in the issue and that we should be well informed. My amendments were not successful, because the Government whipped its members to vote them down.

From the front bench, Ivan McKee gave a commitment and a guarantee that he would publish all the information that I had requested. Indeed, he urged me not to press my amendments, because he was going to publish the information anyway.

My question is: how long do we have to wait? That was the end of November last year. We are now into February 2026, and the Government has still not provided that information. Why is that? Did the minister, deliberately or otherwise, mislead Parliament when he said that he would release it? What powers do we, as back benchers, or do you, as Presiding Officer, have to force or compel the Government to provide the information that it said that it would? Indeed, it got support for opposing my amendments through its commitment to release that information.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Points of Order

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Douglas Ross

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I decided to raise a point of order to get advice from you and so that the Government front bench can listen and, I hope, respond.

The Presiding Officer will recall that, on 27 November, the Parliament had to meet in an emergency session to rush through legislation to fix a mistake in the Non-Domestic Rates (Liability for Unoccupied Properties) (Scotland) Bill that the Scottish National Party took through the Parliament. During the course of the consideration of the bill, we found out that the Government knew about the issue months or weeks before it originally said that it did. There was confusion everywhere: Graeme Dey had to correct the Official Report and Ivan McKee had to be asked three or four times before we could finally get an answer from him. I lodged amendments to the bill in order to get important information from the Government. We heard from all sides of the chamber that transparency was paramount in the issue and that we should be well informed. My amendments were not successful, because the Government whipped its members to vote them down.

From the front bench, Ivan McKee gave a commitment and a guarantee that he would publish all the information that I had requested. Indeed, he urged me not to press my amendments, because he was going to publish the information anyway.

My question is: how long do we have to wait? That was the end of November last year. We are now into February 2026, and the Government has still not provided that information. Why is that? Did the minister, deliberately or otherwise, mislead Parliament when he said that he would release it? What powers do we, as back benchers, or do you, as Presiding Officer, have to force or compel the Government to provide the information that it said that it would? Indeed, it got support for opposing my amendments through its commitment to release that information.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Urgent Questions

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Douglas Ross

What?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Urgent Questions

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Douglas Ross

Come on!

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Urgent Questions

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Douglas Ross

The cabinet secretary failed to answer Liam Kerr’s question, so let me repeat it. If the consultation, which lasts three days, comes back against the cabinet secretary’s proposals, will she abandon her plans or press ahead regardless?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Douglas Ross

Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer—I am personally grateful to you for calling me, but we are in a terrible state in this Parliament if legislators are restricted to just two minutes to speak on an important piece of legislation.

I cannot go through the formalities, as I would like to do, of praising the member in charge of the bill, who has done incredible work, as I want to get to the root of where we are tonight and at decision time. I just cannot get my head around the Government’s position on the bill. What is being asked for tonight is simply to agree to the bill’s general principles, not to get into the detail of the bill—that comes later. Those principles are agreed to by the Government, and by the party of government, so why is the Government opposing them?

I have thought about it a quite lot, and I think that it might come down to politics, or perhaps Fergus Ewing was right that it comes down to personalities. The Government bears a grudge against anyone who steps out of line, and someone does not step further out of line than by resigning ministerial office. To say to the First Minister at the time, Nicola Sturgeon, that her Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was a mess and was going to ruin the safety of women and girls, and to resign from Government, has consequences. I think that, sadly, years later, those consequences are going to be felt by some of the most vulnerable women and girls in Scotland, because the Government is still holding a grudge against the member in charge of the bill, who was brave enough to step down at that time.

I have only 30 more seconds. We have heard from SNP members tonight who are going to break the whip. We have heard, I believe, from one SNP member who has spoken up in support of the Government’s position. Where are the rest? If they are happy to vote down the bill tonight simply to say that they do not agree with the general principles, they should tell us why. We have not heard from those members—they have been silent. The Government has taken up more of its speaking time with one individual member—

Rona Mackayrose—

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Douglas Ross

They should do so knowing—

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Douglas Ross

—that their vote tonight—