The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 235 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
That is a huge question. The tournaments—I think that the Euros are the third biggest sporting spectacle in the world—are a hugely commercial exercise. I absolutely understand where you are coming from. However, that is why there are a lot of issues around ticket touting, and the measures are to ensure that there is fair access to tickets for ordinary fans. I think that 97 per cent of the revenue that UEFA gets from those tournaments goes back into football at all levels. That helps the sport globally, including here in Scotland.
I do not have a ready answer as to what the alternative is to what you might be getting at, but these are clearly issues for public debate, and I pay close attention to them.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
You could make the argument that that could apply to many laws. We have our own demands from UEFA to put in place legislation to ensure that we can be one of the host nations.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
That is a fair reflection of the Government’s approach to this. As part of our conditions as a host nation, we have to ensure that sponsors and those who have invested in Euro 2028—UEFA will be in charge of all of that—are protected, and that others do not have any ambush marketing in the zones. We are talking about people wanting to exploit commercial opportunities, which has to be safeguarded against.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
As I indicated previously, our take on that is that there could be circumstances in which waiting for a warrant defeats the purpose of having to stop the infringement. Therefore, under those specific scenarios, enforcement officers would be able to enter premises.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
Only in relation to devolved responsibilities.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
That is part of the debate, is it not? You could argue that the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 is the legislation that is used to ensure that regulations are adhered to across the whole of the UK, rather than the particular bill that we are discussing today. The 2020 act is so controversial because the purpose and theory of the act is to override devolved responsibilities, whereas, here, we are talking about a particular bit of legislation on product regulation.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
Apologies—I am not quite sure that I understand your question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
My understanding is that the UK retains the right to diverge from the EU, but that it has indicated that it would want to align with the EU on environmental law and in some other cases—I cited one example earlier. I guess that it will treat matters on a case-by-case basis.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
I agree with your concerns. I can only assure the committee that there are wider conversations taking place between the Scottish Government and the UK Government about a lot of the issues.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Lochhead
That may well be so in some cases. Clearly, in a case whereby the UK Government came to us to seek consent on any secondary legislation impacting devolved issues, we would have to look at the merits of that. We do not know what would come in the future because it would be through future secondary legislation at UK level. We cannot just leave an open door, however, because there may be some occasions on which the regulation was not appropriate. The principle that we are trying to adhere to is that we cannot just say, “Even though this is impinging on devolution, maybe it is in our interests to have the same products across the UK.” You have to safeguard against the fact that in the future that may not be in our interests, so we have to make sure that we are consulted. If you were right and the regulations were uncontroversial, we might give consent—who knows?—but the point is that we should have the right not to give consent.