That is a good question. After the first meeting, the challenge was that there were dozens of topics that people wanted to raise. However, the topics are distinctive and I am not aware of any of them being explored in depth at other cross-party groups.
I mentioned endometriosis, and if we are looking at diseases such as ovarian cancer there seems to be a recurring issue about the identification of symptoms, so there is an educational issue for the medical profession. Other topics have been raised about access to reproductive health and rights for disabled women and, again, no other cross-party groups are looking at those topics. There is also the question of how we improve attendance at smear tests.
I have done some work on access to sanitary products and I have also looked at access to incontinence products. Some issues have been raised by physiotherapists that link back to mesh implants and I know that the Parliament is well aware of that issue. There might be other cross-party groups that are looking at the mesh situation.
The group is about the experience of women as they try to access healthcare, the barriers to that, such as availability of childcare, and the impact of gender-based violence and domestic abuse. There is also mental health, which is an example of a topic on which we could speak to the relevant cross-party group.